Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone has insight on Starfinder 2E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The-Magic-Sword" data-source="post: 9662700" data-attributes="member: 6801252"><p>I think that the answer to that question hinges very heavily on the specific nuance of "PF2E design decisions that you feel aren't the Best Decisions for Starfinder 2e" like some people have said they feel that way, but their apprehension is usually before playing it, or is revealed to be based on a general dislike of the 2e engine, rather than anything specific about it that doesn't suit Starfinder-- more like they were hoping it wouldn't suit Starfinder to incidentally arrive at a more 3.5e esque experience. The characters turned out balanced with their fantasy hero counterparts, but there's nothing inherently wrong with that, especially since the interoperability surpasses genre-- you can essentially use a Pathfinder class to make a very sci-fi character provided you blend it with Starfinder equipment. </p><p></p><p>I've also noticed that some of the bigger issues some people have trouble overcoming is the basic idea of sci-fi/fantasy being on power par, but that only comes up if you blend the games in a way that emphasizes the medieval nature of Pathfinder, like, if the PF characters are using medieval steel weapons and stuff-- if your Barbarian is using a Lightsaber... that's just a very particular breed of jedi/sith type and there's nothing to bother you. </p><p></p><p>That said, I've certainly seen plenty of Starfinder 1e players who were excited for it to come to the 2e engine, hoping for the better balance and streamlining (the 2e engine is generally regarded as much less tedious), full casters, etc. The Ancestry model really helps the 'cantina' vibe I think, because the aliens are more different from each other, they have more abilities associated with that side of them. </p><p></p><p>My own experience is that the characters and equipment from it do a good job of feeling Science Fantasy even when played alongside Pathfinder characters, like our Soldier with the Plasma Cannon in the jetpack wasn't outpacing our Rogue, but the way they were shelling areas and using their jetpack has a tacticool vibe to it you'd expect from the options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The-Magic-Sword, post: 9662700, member: 6801252"] I think that the answer to that question hinges very heavily on the specific nuance of "PF2E design decisions that you feel aren't the Best Decisions for Starfinder 2e" like some people have said they feel that way, but their apprehension is usually before playing it, or is revealed to be based on a general dislike of the 2e engine, rather than anything specific about it that doesn't suit Starfinder-- more like they were hoping it wouldn't suit Starfinder to incidentally arrive at a more 3.5e esque experience. The characters turned out balanced with their fantasy hero counterparts, but there's nothing inherently wrong with that, especially since the interoperability surpasses genre-- you can essentially use a Pathfinder class to make a very sci-fi character provided you blend it with Starfinder equipment. I've also noticed that some of the bigger issues some people have trouble overcoming is the basic idea of sci-fi/fantasy being on power par, but that only comes up if you blend the games in a way that emphasizes the medieval nature of Pathfinder, like, if the PF characters are using medieval steel weapons and stuff-- if your Barbarian is using a Lightsaber... that's just a very particular breed of jedi/sith type and there's nothing to bother you. That said, I've certainly seen plenty of Starfinder 1e players who were excited for it to come to the 2e engine, hoping for the better balance and streamlining (the 2e engine is generally regarded as much less tedious), full casters, etc. The Ancestry model really helps the 'cantina' vibe I think, because the aliens are more different from each other, they have more abilities associated with that side of them. My own experience is that the characters and equipment from it do a good job of feeling Science Fantasy even when played alongside Pathfinder characters, like our Soldier with the Plasma Cannon in the jetpack wasn't outpacing our Rogue, but the way they were shelling areas and using their jetpack has a tacticool vibe to it you'd expect from the options. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Anyone has insight on Starfinder 2E?
Top