Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 5502807" data-attributes="member: 29112">By people posting ideas, and doing whatever they (separately and/or collectively) felt like doing with them. A sharing of ideas, to whatever extent people are happy (and comfortable) doing so, with the end result(s) as yet undetermined.Vague? Well, yeah. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Brainstorming, freestyle collaboration / ideas pooling, and the like often tend to be, at least at first, I would say.Like I said, no grand plan / money-making venture here. Nor a "challenge" (hah!) to Pathfinder Basic, that being a different kind of beast, besides.Not even really trying to drum up interest, as it were. Simply seeing how much of that exists already, and whether anyone's done anything about that as yet, be it in thought or in deed, and/or what they might like to do.See above. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> That's as it should be. Except, well, I'd rather that those who are simply opposed to the idea in general... find a another thread/blog/soapbox/other, to express such sentiments or beliefs. You're right - they've been expressed before, on ENWorld as well as elsewhere, and I don't see how they'd be any use to anyone who is keen on doing their own thing with it and/or contributing to some gestalt creation.You are, of course, most welcome to post any or all of them here. Or, yeah, wherever you prefer! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> But if it was somewhere else, and it was relevant to this thread at all - oh, and if you'd have nothing to lose by doing so - posting a link here would be most appreciated.Eh. It ain't for sale. And I'm sure there will be more than one take on this - even if not all of them get posted or linked to here (again, pretty likely in both cases).From my perspective, that would be the one, yes. And I've heard others at ENWorld put across that exact PoV. As for "What is it about Pathfinder" - well, fair enough question. I suppose the angle here is that there might be sufficient gamers who like some of the specific changes from 3.5 to 3.pf, and yet are interested in using / creating a simpler, more streamlined version of it.Never said that I believe there would necessarily be a huge amount of gamers who'd fit that profile! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Just using OGL, is what I was thinking. And no "product" to speak of, anyhow. A nice, neat, printable PDF, for free? Perhaps. But that is all.No worries at all. Input is welcome. I'll take what you've said into consideration, as I'm sure others will. Let each make his or her own mind up about the possibilities/legalities/wisdom, and so on.</blockquote>

Verification