Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Anyone playing Harebrained Schemes Battletech?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 7415171" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>I've played a lot of MW:O and was actually an Elite Founder, but I always ended up disappointed with the game. I am just not that much into pure PvP titles. </p><p>Around the same time as MW:O, the publisher of MW:O also had a project called Mechwarrior: Tactics, which was a turn based strategy game (also focused on PvP). But that project crashed and burned, and I think rightfully so based on my beta experiences. For some reason, they build their own mech models, and they looked just terrible. </p><p></p><p>That Battletech and MW:O use the same models is really, really awesome. And even if the game never quite was what I wanted, I guess I'll always thank MW:O for creating those models and allowing Harebrained Schemes to use them with them. The guys making M:WO area also creating Mechwarrior 5 now ,and I've heard that Battletech also provided some stuff for them in the form of the vehicles (which BT includes. You steer mechs, but enemy and allies forces can use vehicles. No infantry and air craft so far, though.)</p><p>And anyone familiar with the problem of the "Unseen" - it could very well be that PGI might have the coffers to finally bring the Harmony Gold lawsuits against the use of mechs like the Marauder or Warhammer to an end. I don't know if it really works out, but it seems to be going far better and further than any of the previous lawsuits, that always ended up with settlements that never really cleared the legal situation up. FASA and/or Jordan Weisman just never had the financial resources to deal with it.</p><p></p><p>So that would be a second thing I would need to be thankful for towards PGI.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 7415171, member: 710"] I've played a lot of MW:O and was actually an Elite Founder, but I always ended up disappointed with the game. I am just not that much into pure PvP titles. Around the same time as MW:O, the publisher of MW:O also had a project called Mechwarrior: Tactics, which was a turn based strategy game (also focused on PvP). But that project crashed and burned, and I think rightfully so based on my beta experiences. For some reason, they build their own mech models, and they looked just terrible. That Battletech and MW:O use the same models is really, really awesome. And even if the game never quite was what I wanted, I guess I'll always thank MW:O for creating those models and allowing Harebrained Schemes to use them with them. The guys making M:WO area also creating Mechwarrior 5 now ,and I've heard that Battletech also provided some stuff for them in the form of the vehicles (which BT includes. You steer mechs, but enemy and allies forces can use vehicles. No infantry and air craft so far, though.) And anyone familiar with the problem of the "Unseen" - it could very well be that PGI might have the coffers to finally bring the Harmony Gold lawsuits against the use of mechs like the Marauder or Warhammer to an end. I don't know if it really works out, but it seems to be going far better and further than any of the previous lawsuits, that always ended up with settlements that never really cleared the legal situation up. FASA and/or Jordan Weisman just never had the financial resources to deal with it. So that would be a second thing I would need to be thankful for towards PGI. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Anyone playing Harebrained Schemes Battletech?
Top