Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Anyone still making 3.5e material?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sylrae" data-source="post: 5259782" data-attributes="member: 48520"><p>Personally I'd recommend jumping onto the Pathfinder bandwagon. their core system is a bit tighter(more internally consistent) than 3.x (though I'd prefer it be even tighter than it is), I haven't seen any of their changes as worse than 3.x.</p><p></p><p>I know the compatibility described above, because I do alot of the reverse. I play and run PFRPG, and I want to be able to use much of the 3.x content (as a DM AND as a player).</p><p></p><p>Pathfinder characters tend to be "BETTER" than 3.x characters, but not necessarily more powerful. They tend to have gained a pretty slight power boost, and a big boost in utility. You have more options, but not really more powerful options.</p><p></p><p>A few classes got their balance shifted up or down a tad. BAB is tied to HD now, so everyone gets a d6, d8, or d10 (Barbarian keeps the shiny d12).</p><p></p><p>I like the PFRPG System better than 3.x, and everyone I've played with who knows 3.x ends up liking PFRPG better after they try it (except when they say "I want to use X from 3.5, but PFRPG doesn't have it.")</p><p></p><p>Note: While compatible, I know alot of PFRPG DMs who won't allow classes from 3.5, worried that they will be over or under powered (this is mostly superstition). Personally I tend to allow but require converting (usually slight changes), then I add it to my ever-growing library of usable PFRPG options.</p><p></p><p>You can reverse engineer it back down to 3.5, but it's worth it to convert the 3.5 you want up to PFRPG instead. As explained above, alot of the stuff is usable as is, or the conversion is pretty easy, Classes being the only part that take much work.</p><p></p><p>Monsters in PFRPG are better balanced for their CR as well. There's some mathematical analysis at the back of the bestiary that makes it alot easier to make new monsters.</p><p></p><p>One thing I should mention:</p><p><strong>LA no longer exists.</strong></p><p>It wasn't a very good system to begin with, and Paizo dropped it entirely.</p><p>The slight power boost that races got puts them around the +1LA mark though, so +1 LA races can be used with little change. </p><p></p><p>For people who want the higher LA creatures for players, I'd recommend building a custom base race and then a player class that emulates the monster's abilities (I ditched LA a long time ago), but I know most people don't want to go to that much work to play the monsters they want to play. Here's the <a href="http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=142724" target="_blank">best option I've seen</a> that's already done for you. Designed for 3.5, but it works just fine in PFRPG as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sylrae, post: 5259782, member: 48520"] Personally I'd recommend jumping onto the Pathfinder bandwagon. their core system is a bit tighter(more internally consistent) than 3.x (though I'd prefer it be even tighter than it is), I haven't seen any of their changes as worse than 3.x. I know the compatibility described above, because I do alot of the reverse. I play and run PFRPG, and I want to be able to use much of the 3.x content (as a DM AND as a player). Pathfinder characters tend to be "BETTER" than 3.x characters, but not necessarily more powerful. They tend to have gained a pretty slight power boost, and a big boost in utility. You have more options, but not really more powerful options. A few classes got their balance shifted up or down a tad. BAB is tied to HD now, so everyone gets a d6, d8, or d10 (Barbarian keeps the shiny d12). I like the PFRPG System better than 3.x, and everyone I've played with who knows 3.x ends up liking PFRPG better after they try it (except when they say "I want to use X from 3.5, but PFRPG doesn't have it.") Note: While compatible, I know alot of PFRPG DMs who won't allow classes from 3.5, worried that they will be over or under powered (this is mostly superstition). Personally I tend to allow but require converting (usually slight changes), then I add it to my ever-growing library of usable PFRPG options. You can reverse engineer it back down to 3.5, but it's worth it to convert the 3.5 you want up to PFRPG instead. As explained above, alot of the stuff is usable as is, or the conversion is pretty easy, Classes being the only part that take much work. Monsters in PFRPG are better balanced for their CR as well. There's some mathematical analysis at the back of the bestiary that makes it alot easier to make new monsters. One thing I should mention: [B]LA no longer exists.[/B] It wasn't a very good system to begin with, and Paizo dropped it entirely. The slight power boost that races got puts them around the +1LA mark though, so +1 LA races can be used with little change. For people who want the higher LA creatures for players, I'd recommend building a custom base race and then a player class that emulates the monster's abilities (I ditched LA a long time ago), but I know most people don't want to go to that much work to play the monsters they want to play. Here's the [URL="http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=142724"]best option I've seen[/URL] that's already done for you. Designed for 3.5, but it works just fine in PFRPG as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Anyone still making 3.5e material?
Top