Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
AoO dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cyan Wisp" data-source="post: 4734456" data-attributes="member: 38623"><p>Hi, folks. I have just started playing in a new group. The other night, the DM ruled something odd - but the others seemed to agree with him. </p><p></p><p>Scene: Lich, flanked by me and other PC. Lich "casts defensively" but fails his Concentration check. Spell fizzles. Lich then moves away from us, leaving a threatened square...</p><p></p><p>Me: "He's moving? Too bad for him, er.. it! I'll just roll for my AoO [pick up d20]...<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devious.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":]" title="Devious :]" data-shortname=":]" />"</p><p>DM:" No AoO...he took the risk by casting defensively so you don't get an AoO."</p><p>Me: "Huh? Wha? <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/worried.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":-S" title="Uhm :-S" data-shortname=":-S" />... but he cast defensively. That means he didn't provoke an AoO, so I still have my one AoO for the round! I'll use it for his moving out of a threatened square [shake d20]..."</p><p>DM: "That's what he made the check for. He cast defensively. He took the risk of messing up his spell. That is his penalty. He won't also have to deal with an AoO."</p><p>PC: [A wizard. Figures.] "...yeah, that's how we've been playing it. Makes sense."</p><p>Me: "...but, er, um...[mumble, mumble]. All right, I won't argue. Let's get on with it [drop d20].<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />"</p><p></p><p>Later, when another spellcaster was in checkmate by the party, I wryly commented: "why don't you just fail a concentration check for casting defensively. Then you can just dance around us with impunity."</p><p></p><p>DM: "Yeah. I am sure that's how it works. I remember reading it somewhere in the faq or something."</p><p></p><p>Ok, so who is crazy here? I have searched the faq and the "All About..." articles. I have mined the PHB and even looked in D&D for Dummies! To make it worse, I forgot my character had Combat Reflexes, but hat shouldn't matter for the dilemma at hand.</p><p></p><p>My questions are these:</p><p>1. If a character avoids AoO (by tumbling or casting defensively, etc) does that mean that an opponent then loses their AoO for the round against that character? [I pick "No. Not provoked, so not expended. Still have their AoO to use for another opportunity that may arise. Otherwise you would only need one tumble check/opponent - for the first square you leave."]</p><p>2. Is there a RAW answer to this? With reference page, please!</p><p></p><p>Thank you if decide to help me (or just empathise).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cyan Wisp, post: 4734456, member: 38623"] Hi, folks. I have just started playing in a new group. The other night, the DM ruled something odd - but the others seemed to agree with him. Scene: Lich, flanked by me and other PC. Lich "casts defensively" but fails his Concentration check. Spell fizzles. Lich then moves away from us, leaving a threatened square... Me: "He's moving? Too bad for him, er.. it! I'll just roll for my AoO [pick up d20]...:]" DM:" No AoO...he took the risk by casting defensively so you don't get an AoO." Me: "Huh? Wha? :-S... but he cast defensively. That means he didn't provoke an AoO, so I still have my one AoO for the round! I'll use it for his moving out of a threatened square [shake d20]..." DM: "That's what he made the check for. He cast defensively. He took the risk of messing up his spell. That is his penalty. He won't also have to deal with an AoO." PC: [A wizard. Figures.] "...yeah, that's how we've been playing it. Makes sense." Me: "...but, er, um...[mumble, mumble]. All right, I won't argue. Let's get on with it [drop d20].:(" Later, when another spellcaster was in checkmate by the party, I wryly commented: "why don't you just fail a concentration check for casting defensively. Then you can just dance around us with impunity." DM: "Yeah. I am sure that's how it works. I remember reading it somewhere in the faq or something." Ok, so who is crazy here? I have searched the faq and the "All About..." articles. I have mined the PHB and even looked in D&D for Dummies! To make it worse, I forgot my character had Combat Reflexes, but hat shouldn't matter for the dilemma at hand. My questions are these: 1. If a character avoids AoO (by tumbling or casting defensively, etc) does that mean that an opponent then loses their AoO for the round against that character? [I pick "No. Not provoked, so not expended. Still have their AoO to use for another opportunity that may arise. Otherwise you would only need one tumble check/opponent - for the first square you leave."] 2. Is there a RAW answer to this? With reference page, please! Thank you if decide to help me (or just empathise). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
AoO dilemma
Top