Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
AoO Headaches...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 2722258" data-attributes="member: 31734"><p>No problem. In actuality, I think trading a few attacks of opporunity would be pretty neat, much like Patryn illustrated.</p><p></p><p> There might be a thread, but I don't have search capability. I could be thinking of other forums. Anyway, since you asked and are the original poster, let me briefly describe both sides. The assumption here is that you plan to take a full attack action and have BAB +6 or higher.</p><p></p><p><strong>Sunder is a Standard Action</strong></p><p>Sunder is a standard action because it's listed as such in the <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/actionsInCombat.htm#standardActions" target="_blank">standard actions table</a>.</p><p></p><p><strong>Sunder is a Melee Attack</strong></p><p>Note that Attack (melee) is also listed as a standard action in the table, but the <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/actionsInCombat.htm#fullAttack" target="_blank">full attack action</a> let's you take more than one per round, which is an exception to the one standard action per round rule (except for Hyper chokers, of course <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />). Because Sunder specifically says "You can use a melee attack ..." I (and others who support my position) argue that Sunder can be used in a full attack action in place of the regular melee attack action. Even if one views this as a conflict between the Sunder text and the table, text takes precedence.</p><p></p><p><strong>Rebuttal for Sunder is a Standard Action</strong></p><p>None of the other special attacks (that specify as "melee attack") are listed on the Standard Actions table, so the same equivalency of Sunder==Melee Attack cannot be made as it is for disarm or trip. Additionally, there is the footnote under the Miscellaneous Actions table specifically and only for disarm, grapple, and trip that says "These attack forms substitute for a melee attack, not an action. As melee attacks, they can be used once in an attack or charge action, one or more times in a full attack action, or even as an attack of opportunity. "</p><p></p><p>Patryn, is that succinct and accurate? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Edit: Added footnote.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 2722258, member: 31734"] No problem. In actuality, I think trading a few attacks of opporunity would be pretty neat, much like Patryn illustrated. There might be a thread, but I don't have search capability. I could be thinking of other forums. Anyway, since you asked and are the original poster, let me briefly describe both sides. The assumption here is that you plan to take a full attack action and have BAB +6 or higher. [B]Sunder is a Standard Action[/B] Sunder is a standard action because it's listed as such in the [URL=http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/actionsInCombat.htm#standardActions]standard actions table[/URL]. [B]Sunder is a Melee Attack[/B] Note that Attack (melee) is also listed as a standard action in the table, but the [URL=http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/actionsInCombat.htm#fullAttack]full attack action[/URL] let's you take more than one per round, which is an exception to the one standard action per round rule (except for Hyper chokers, of course ;)). Because Sunder specifically says "You can use a melee attack ..." I (and others who support my position) argue that Sunder can be used in a full attack action in place of the regular melee attack action. Even if one views this as a conflict between the Sunder text and the table, text takes precedence. [B]Rebuttal for Sunder is a Standard Action[/B] None of the other special attacks (that specify as "melee attack") are listed on the Standard Actions table, so the same equivalency of Sunder==Melee Attack cannot be made as it is for disarm or trip. Additionally, there is the footnote under the Miscellaneous Actions table specifically and only for disarm, grapple, and trip that says "These attack forms substitute for a melee attack, not an action. As melee attacks, they can be used once in an attack or charge action, one or more times in a full attack action, or even as an attack of opportunity. " Patryn, is that succinct and accurate? :) Edit: Added footnote. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
AoO Headaches...
Top