Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 6563198" data-attributes="member: 22424">I assume that by CS you mean Campaign Setting? If not, my answers below are nonsense. Or, perhaps, even more nonsense. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />4e had two Adventure Paths: the nine published adventures that started with "Keep on the Shadowfell" and the "Scales of War" path that appeared in eDungeon. Neither was terribly well received, so thereafter they mostly stuck with standalone adventures.That said, I believe there were some hints of 'storylines' in that they had several eDungeon adventures that were grouped under a banner (I forget what it was called) but which weren't a path as such.But, really, this change of focus seems to have come about with 5e. I don't believe anything 'happened' as such - it's just a change in direction.My feeling is that it's actually more about licensing. D&D, despite having 40 years of history, actually doesn't have a lot of recognisable characters. There are a few - Drizzt, Strahd, Lord Soth - but only a few. That makes it harder for WotC to license D&D out for movies, video games, etc than it would be if they had such things.And so they're focusing on 'storylines' - which is not just an AP but also includes a season of Adventurer League adventures, NWN tie-ins, possibly novels, etc etc. This (hopefully) generates some of those iconic characters, plus scenes, locations, and plotlines, and thus gives them IP that they can license out more easily.At least, that's the theory (I think).I don't think we've changed. Rather, I think they've finally recognised that the biggest group of players buys nothing at all, the next biggest buys just the PHB, the next buys just the Core Rulebooks, and then smaller groups buy PHB+splatbook or Core Three+campaign setting or Core Three+adventures, or whatever. Beyond that, there's a fairly tiny group that buys deeply into the line, and we're just not numerous enough to justify lots of releases.</blockquote>

Verification