Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Apparently Wizards are perfectly balanced :)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 4406545" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>Did you not notice that I used math previously as well to show the superior chance to hit?</p><p></p><p>The math for Karinsdad's analysis was an ideal situation for the wizard. Not a constant standard of combat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is not a rogue versus wizard comparison. I was merely showing that the rogue is far better off attacking Reflex while the wizard is generally not better off attacking reflex versus any melee attacking AC.</p><p></p><p>Even Karinsdad supports this assertion since he found AC and reflex differ by 1.5 on average for low level creatures and proficiency bonuses give +2 to +3 to hit. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Completely irrelevant to the following statement:</p><p></p><p>Wizards receive no advantage compared to melee attacking reflex vs A.C.</p><p></p><p>Rogues attacking Reflex are at an even greater advantage.</p><p></p><p>All you are doing is stating what I already concluded. That rogues hit easier than wizards, thus they do more damage, especially after minions are dead and the melee is spread out.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I already stated this in my other post. Did you read it?</p><p></p><p>I said wizards do greater aggregate damage over the long run. I don't dispute this.</p><p></p><p>But people who complain about wizards are generally those from the 3.5 version of thought. That was when a wizard could deal a huge single target attack as well as AoE.</p><p></p><p>Now the rogue is hands down the best single target striker in the game no matter what you do with your wizard. He hits easier than the wizard. He does more single target damage. This is all by design. So if a 4E wizard player decides to play one hoping to have the feel of being powerful doing big damage hits, he will be disappointed. He will have to be content adding up his damage spread over targets.</p><p></p><p>What are you missing?</p><p></p><p>Are you saying the following isn't true? </p><p></p><p>1. The rogue hits easier.</p><p></p><p>2. The rogue does more single target damage by a rather substantial margin.</p><p></p><p>3. The majority of fights against the big bad evil guy are going to favor the rogue as far as damage goes.</p><p></p><p>4. Once the minions and side help are dead, the rogue becomes the damage king bar none.</p><p></p><p>5. This can be disappointing to players used to the 3.5 wizard who could dish alot of single target damage on top of AoE damage.</p><p></p><p>That is basically what I am asserting and a few of you arguing with me are disputing indisputable truths that are easy to see with the game mechanics.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying a wizard doesn't do good AoE damage and that if you add it up it is comparable. That isn't my argument at all.</p><p></p><p>My argument was simply that I can understand why some wizard players are disappointed playing one. Let's face it, wizards used to be the players dealing death blows. Now rogues and other strikers are dealing death blows and doing huge damage. This is by design. </p><p></p><p>Let me use an example from last night.</p><p></p><p>We were fighting gnomes and giants rats. My friend is playing an Eladrin wizard and I'm playing a Drow rogue.</p><p></p><p>I get surrounded by two gnome skulks. He blasts another two across the room.</p><p></p><p>Wizard: Hits one gnome skulk for a crit with scorching blast for 12 points and does another 10 points to the other gnome. That's a total of 22 points of damage with very good rolls.</p><p></p><p>Rogue: I am on the other two skulks. I use minor action encounter power darkness. The gnomes and I were in darkness. I sly flourish sneak attack the gnome with my rapier.</p><p></p><p>I did 26 points of damage with one hit on a single target. So even his two very nice damage rolls spread out over two targets didn't match my moderately good damage roll against a single target.</p><p></p><p>So imagine when the wizard is trying to do single target damage and having to watch the rogue tear up a BBEG? Would you feel powerful next to that guy? A guy who is often doubling the damage you do even when you roll well? </p><p></p><p>Not super fun unless you are happy adding up the aggregate damage you do and watching the strikers land finishing blows.</p><p></p><p>So I understand some 4E wizard players used to playing old edition wizards feeling disatisfied with the new wizard class. He pales in comparison to the old wizard in terms of doing single target damage and the rogue makes him look rather impotent in situations where single target damage is king like against most Big Bad Evil Guys.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 4406545, member: 5834"] Did you not notice that I used math previously as well to show the superior chance to hit? The math for Karinsdad's analysis was an ideal situation for the wizard. Not a constant standard of combat. This is not a rogue versus wizard comparison. I was merely showing that the rogue is far better off attacking Reflex while the wizard is generally not better off attacking reflex versus any melee attacking AC. Even Karinsdad supports this assertion since he found AC and reflex differ by 1.5 on average for low level creatures and proficiency bonuses give +2 to +3 to hit. Completely irrelevant to the following statement: Wizards receive no advantage compared to melee attacking reflex vs A.C. Rogues attacking Reflex are at an even greater advantage. All you are doing is stating what I already concluded. That rogues hit easier than wizards, thus they do more damage, especially after minions are dead and the melee is spread out. I already stated this in my other post. Did you read it? I said wizards do greater aggregate damage over the long run. I don't dispute this. But people who complain about wizards are generally those from the 3.5 version of thought. That was when a wizard could deal a huge single target attack as well as AoE. Now the rogue is hands down the best single target striker in the game no matter what you do with your wizard. He hits easier than the wizard. He does more single target damage. This is all by design. So if a 4E wizard player decides to play one hoping to have the feel of being powerful doing big damage hits, he will be disappointed. He will have to be content adding up his damage spread over targets. What are you missing? Are you saying the following isn't true? 1. The rogue hits easier. 2. The rogue does more single target damage by a rather substantial margin. 3. The majority of fights against the big bad evil guy are going to favor the rogue as far as damage goes. 4. Once the minions and side help are dead, the rogue becomes the damage king bar none. 5. This can be disappointing to players used to the 3.5 wizard who could dish alot of single target damage on top of AoE damage. That is basically what I am asserting and a few of you arguing with me are disputing indisputable truths that are easy to see with the game mechanics. I'm not saying a wizard doesn't do good AoE damage and that if you add it up it is comparable. That isn't my argument at all. My argument was simply that I can understand why some wizard players are disappointed playing one. Let's face it, wizards used to be the players dealing death blows. Now rogues and other strikers are dealing death blows and doing huge damage. This is by design. Let me use an example from last night. We were fighting gnomes and giants rats. My friend is playing an Eladrin wizard and I'm playing a Drow rogue. I get surrounded by two gnome skulks. He blasts another two across the room. Wizard: Hits one gnome skulk for a crit with scorching blast for 12 points and does another 10 points to the other gnome. That's a total of 22 points of damage with very good rolls. Rogue: I am on the other two skulks. I use minor action encounter power darkness. The gnomes and I were in darkness. I sly flourish sneak attack the gnome with my rapier. I did 26 points of damage with one hit on a single target. So even his two very nice damage rolls spread out over two targets didn't match my moderately good damage roll against a single target. So imagine when the wizard is trying to do single target damage and having to watch the rogue tear up a BBEG? Would you feel powerful next to that guy? A guy who is often doubling the damage you do even when you roll well? Not super fun unless you are happy adding up the aggregate damage you do and watching the strikers land finishing blows. So I understand some 4E wizard players used to playing old edition wizards feeling disatisfied with the new wizard class. He pales in comparison to the old wizard in terms of doing single target damage and the rogue makes him look rather impotent in situations where single target damage is king like against most Big Bad Evil Guys. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Apparently Wizards are perfectly balanced :)
Top