Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Apple HAS switched to lntel!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rackhir" data-source="post: 2314018" data-attributes="member: 149"><p>Reading some of the after action reports, it's looking increasingly like the motivation for the switch wasn't so much the PPC now as a year or two down the road. </p><p></p><p>IBM is getting geared up to make chips for the next gen consoles, since all of them are running off of one of their chips or a variation there of. Which means that they are going to be focusing on producing tens of millions of chips for those systems and not on producing the kind of PPC chips Apple needs. Their efforts in that realm obviously already having been inadiquate.</p><p></p><p>So basically what it looks like things have come down to is that Apple couldn't get anyone to continue investing in the kind of chips they would have needed to keep with the PPC platform. Motorola, gave up on that several years ago and IBM would be increasingly distracted by the chips for the consoles. That doesn't really leave Apple anywhere to go but X86. </p><p></p><p>Now you can speculate as to why Apple hasn't gone with AMD rather than Intel, but I suspect its a simple matter of marketing and economics. Intel has vastly greater resources for marketing and has been wooing Apple for decades. So it seems likely that they've offered Apple some significant inducements to go with them and Apple will be able to benefit all the marketing hype behind "Intel Inside". In other words, going with Intel is probably calculated to help get them through the transistion period. </p><p></p><p>I suspect that we will see Apple dabbling at least in using AMD Chips in about 2 years once the transition has been completed. They won't need Intel as much at that point. </p><p></p><p>Of course it's fairly pointless to speculate on what the chips will be like by then. An entirely new generation of chips will be out by then, quite possibly quad core chips or something like that. The system architecture will likely be as important or more important than the processors at that point, since the more processors you put into a system the better that system has to be designed if you are going to get the full benefit from them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rackhir, post: 2314018, member: 149"] Reading some of the after action reports, it's looking increasingly like the motivation for the switch wasn't so much the PPC now as a year or two down the road. IBM is getting geared up to make chips for the next gen consoles, since all of them are running off of one of their chips or a variation there of. Which means that they are going to be focusing on producing tens of millions of chips for those systems and not on producing the kind of PPC chips Apple needs. Their efforts in that realm obviously already having been inadiquate. So basically what it looks like things have come down to is that Apple couldn't get anyone to continue investing in the kind of chips they would have needed to keep with the PPC platform. Motorola, gave up on that several years ago and IBM would be increasingly distracted by the chips for the consoles. That doesn't really leave Apple anywhere to go but X86. Now you can speculate as to why Apple hasn't gone with AMD rather than Intel, but I suspect its a simple matter of marketing and economics. Intel has vastly greater resources for marketing and has been wooing Apple for decades. So it seems likely that they've offered Apple some significant inducements to go with them and Apple will be able to benefit all the marketing hype behind "Intel Inside". In other words, going with Intel is probably calculated to help get them through the transistion period. I suspect that we will see Apple dabbling at least in using AMD Chips in about 2 years once the transition has been completed. They won't need Intel as much at that point. Of course it's fairly pointless to speculate on what the chips will be like by then. An entirely new generation of chips will be out by then, quite possibly quad core chips or something like that. The system architecture will likely be as important or more important than the processors at that point, since the more processors you put into a system the better that system has to be designed if you are going to get the full benefit from them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Apple HAS switched to lntel!!!
Top