Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
April 3rd, Rule of 3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KidSnide" data-source="post: 5870478" data-attributes="member: 54710"><p>I don't think that's right. If you want modular add-ons to work right, you need to know what those add-ons could be and how they are supposed to fit in, but you can still experiment with a core without building out an iteration of every module for each iteration of the core.</p><p></p><p>The real problem is that it takes a lot of time to write a "whole game" and WotC doesn't have the resources to do that dozens of times. Instead, WotC says that it will concentrate on a core game and let folks playtest that before expanding to every other race and class. That seems like a great idea to me. This way, WotC has a chance to receive feedback on the core rules before they have invested so much in them. I think this greatly increases the chances that they will change the game based on playtester feedback.</p><p></p><p>Would I prefer playtesting a complete game? Sure. I just fear that, once a complete game has been written, there will be too much commitment to too the core assumptions of the game. I'd like a chance to playtest those core assumptions.</p><p></p><p>-KS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KidSnide, post: 5870478, member: 54710"] I don't think that's right. If you want modular add-ons to work right, you need to know what those add-ons could be and how they are supposed to fit in, but you can still experiment with a core without building out an iteration of every module for each iteration of the core. The real problem is that it takes a lot of time to write a "whole game" and WotC doesn't have the resources to do that dozens of times. Instead, WotC says that it will concentrate on a core game and let folks playtest that before expanding to every other race and class. That seems like a great idea to me. This way, WotC has a chance to receive feedback on the core rules before they have invested so much in them. I think this greatly increases the chances that they will change the game based on playtester feedback. Would I prefer playtesting a complete game? Sure. I just fear that, once a complete game has been written, there will be too much commitment to too the core assumptions of the game. I'd like a chance to playtest those core assumptions. -KS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
April 3rd, Rule of 3
Top