Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
April 3rd, Rule of 3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Janaxstrus" data-source="post: 5870794" data-attributes="member: 3201"><p>Everyone? I have not suggested anyone should leave or not participate, let alone everyone.</p><p></p><p>I have problems with non-magical "magic" like healing, I have issues with daily/encounter/etc powers, especially when they are non-magic Magic (including the ones in 3.5), and I don't like some of the 4e terms used, especially those overly game-y. I dislike the overly tactical nature, at the expense of the feel (for me, ymmv)</p><p></p><p></p><p>If too many of those things are in the base system of 5e, it will not be something that appeals to me or the dozen or so people I game with. If that's the case, we'll continue to take our dollars elsewhere. I am about 99% sure I am not alone in disliking many of those changes. </p><p></p><p></p><p>On the other hand, I don't want THAC0 coming back, Non-Weapon Proficiency, Demihuman level limits, CODZilla, PunPun, 18/00 strengths, 20d6 fireballs, or any of that stuff either. The difference? They aren't talking about putting the stuff I don't care for from older editions back into the new system. And if they start talking any of those, I'll be railing against those as well.</p><p></p><p>I know WotC people frequent these forums, and it would do everyone a disservice if the only feedback they got was people praising everything. I don't feel that making it known that some of these things are deal breakers is out of line. Whether the game succeeds or fails, they should at least hear from people what they do and don't like, so they can't claim ignorance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Janaxstrus, post: 5870794, member: 3201"] Everyone? I have not suggested anyone should leave or not participate, let alone everyone. I have problems with non-magical "magic" like healing, I have issues with daily/encounter/etc powers, especially when they are non-magic Magic (including the ones in 3.5), and I don't like some of the 4e terms used, especially those overly game-y. I dislike the overly tactical nature, at the expense of the feel (for me, ymmv) If too many of those things are in the base system of 5e, it will not be something that appeals to me or the dozen or so people I game with. If that's the case, we'll continue to take our dollars elsewhere. I am about 99% sure I am not alone in disliking many of those changes. On the other hand, I don't want THAC0 coming back, Non-Weapon Proficiency, Demihuman level limits, CODZilla, PunPun, 18/00 strengths, 20d6 fireballs, or any of that stuff either. The difference? They aren't talking about putting the stuff I don't care for from older editions back into the new system. And if they start talking any of those, I'll be railing against those as well. I know WotC people frequent these forums, and it would do everyone a disservice if the only feedback they got was people praising everything. I don't feel that making it known that some of these things are deal breakers is out of line. Whether the game succeeds or fails, they should at least hear from people what they do and don't like, so they can't claim ignorance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
April 3rd, Rule of 3
Top