Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
April 3rd, Rule of 3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 5875509"><p>this is simply a matter of preference. Some people enjoy a style of play where the prime consideration is the flow of the game itself and inconvenient issues related to realism are removed or greatly reduced. Of this works for you, i am fine with that. For me there is a serious believability issue with natural healing being instantaneous or nearly so. But magic doesn't present such an issue because the nature of magic is to alter reality. So there is the first issue.</p><p></p><p>You raise an interesting point that heaing usually ends up falling on magic at a some point anyways. But for me that still ties in to the first point. I dont care if people are ultimately going to resort to magical heaing, what is important is that for instant to one day healing, magic be required because the disruption of disbelief for me is too great to handwave. So for me, the end result is actually not as important as how you get there (though that has serious implications for the end result). Even if most people resort to magical heaping that has built in limits as well and there will be times when your magical healers are killed or knocked ou and unable to heal the party. There will also be parties without magical healers in them ( i have seen this several times). </p><p></p><p>And this ties into other issues I have with the 4e system, like mundane dailies and encounter powers. </p><p></p><p>If you disagree that is fine. Play what you like. If someone else finds 4e more realistic than 3e or 2e or 1e, that is great. I can see how pemerton may feel that way given his interpretation of HP. For me that just isn't how I see the game and it isn't my experience of it. But it shouldn't be hard for us to understand where the other side is coming from at this stage. Both are coming from reasonable positions, and unless the intent is to keepnasking questions in order to win thw argument in socratic fashion, I don't really see the purpose of hairsplitting here (when my guess is most of us have already asked and answered these questions multiple times in the past).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 85555, post: 5875509"] this is simply a matter of preference. Some people enjoy a style of play where the prime consideration is the flow of the game itself and inconvenient issues related to realism are removed or greatly reduced. Of this works for you, i am fine with that. For me there is a serious believability issue with natural healing being instantaneous or nearly so. But magic doesn't present such an issue because the nature of magic is to alter reality. So there is the first issue. You raise an interesting point that heaing usually ends up falling on magic at a some point anyways. But for me that still ties in to the first point. I dont care if people are ultimately going to resort to magical heaing, what is important is that for instant to one day healing, magic be required because the disruption of disbelief for me is too great to handwave. So for me, the end result is actually not as important as how you get there (though that has serious implications for the end result). Even if most people resort to magical heaping that has built in limits as well and there will be times when your magical healers are killed or knocked ou and unable to heal the party. There will also be parties without magical healers in them ( i have seen this several times). And this ties into other issues I have with the 4e system, like mundane dailies and encounter powers. If you disagree that is fine. Play what you like. If someone else finds 4e more realistic than 3e or 2e or 1e, that is great. I can see how pemerton may feel that way given his interpretation of HP. For me that just isn't how I see the game and it isn't my experience of it. But it shouldn't be hard for us to understand where the other side is coming from at this stage. Both are coming from reasonable positions, and unless the intent is to keepnasking questions in order to win thw argument in socratic fashion, I don't really see the purpose of hairsplitting here (when my guess is most of us have already asked and answered these questions multiple times in the past). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
April 3rd, Rule of 3
Top