Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5877435" data-attributes="member: 957">First I'll point out that less than 24 hours ago you were taking offense at the suggestion that 3E healing take weeks and, as I agreed, it isn't that long.&nbsp; But now suddenly you are using weeks as an attempt at criticism.&nbsp; Pick a side.But beyond that, you've missed the point.Natural healing is far and away the exception in D&amp;D.&nbsp; Just as you describe cinematic wounds with lasting effect as the exception.However they provide the baseline for all cause and effect wound removal to be compared against.&nbsp; Once you start surging wounds forever gone in the blink of an eye, you have completely changed the fundamental.Further, in this case I was specifically responding to Pemerton's endorsement of all non-fatal HP loss being &quot;mojo&quot; or the like.&nbsp; I've got no issue with that being perfect for him.&nbsp; But I've also presented my reasons for that not working for me.There is</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5877435, member: 957"] First I'll point out that less than 24 hours ago you were taking offense at the suggestion that 3E healing take weeks and, as I agreed, it isn't that long. But now suddenly you are using weeks as an attempt at criticism. Pick a side. But beyond that, you've missed the point. Natural healing is far and away the exception in D&D. Just as you describe cinematic wounds with lasting effect as the exception. However they provide the baseline for all cause and effect wound removal to be compared against. Once you start surging wounds forever gone in the blink of an eye, you have completely changed the fundamental. Further, in this case I was specifically responding to Pemerton's endorsement of all non-fatal HP loss being "mojo" or the like. I've got no issue with that being perfect for him. But I've also presented my reasons for that not working for me. There is [/QUOTE]

Verification