Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7671808" data-attributes="member: 7006">Unfortunately, the loop goes around both ways.&nbsp; If I had to make a guesstimation... I'd say that more often than not the games that actually do high-level content are run by DMs who don't use as much published material and instead create their own.&nbsp; As a result, any high-level published content sells worse than lower-level stuff because it isn't as wanted/needed, and thus WotC's less inclined to publish more of it.And in actuality... I would suspect that the AP model is probably in many ways the more likely way to get games that use published material up to those those high-level marks, because the story is such that it inspires games to go on until they're &quot;complete&quot;.&nbsp; Whereas a 17-20th level module published on its own would see less use because you'd have to have your campaign actually reach that point using other material until such time the high-level module could be dropped in.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7671808, member: 7006"] Unfortunately, the loop goes around both ways. If I had to make a guesstimation... I'd say that more often than not the games that actually do high-level content are run by DMs who don't use as much published material and instead create their own. As a result, any high-level published content sells worse than lower-level stuff because it isn't as wanted/needed, and thus WotC's less inclined to publish more of it. And in actuality... I would suspect that the AP model is probably in many ways the more likely way to get games that use published material up to those those high-level marks, because the story is such that it inspires games to go on until they're "complete". Whereas a 17-20th level module published on its own would see less use because you'd have to have your campaign actually reach that point using other material until such time the high-level module could be dropped in. [/QUOTE]

Verification