Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SWBaxter" data-source="post: 2098432" data-attributes="member: 27926">After playing spellcasters in AU, I no longer have any desire to play any of the major D&amp;D spellcasting classes. They just feel too clunky. &nbsp;&nbsp;The only thing I dislike is the material component cost for some of the spell templates, it leads to a bit of finicky bookkeeping. I like pretty much everything else. IMHO, AU's magic system is the best implementation of a D&amp;D-style magic system yet published.&nbsp;&nbsp;Sure. You could either run AU spellcasters side-by-side with regular D&amp;D spellcasters each using their own rules, or convert the D&amp;D spellcasters to AU-style readied spells and spell slots. I would recommend the former, although I think back when AU was first released somebody did the latter and came up with heightened and diminished versions of every spell in the PHB. No idea where that list would be now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SWBaxter, post: 2098432, member: 27926"] After playing spellcasters in AU, I no longer have any desire to play any of the major D&D spellcasting classes. They just feel too clunky. The only thing I dislike is the material component cost for some of the spell templates, it leads to a bit of finicky bookkeeping. I like pretty much everything else. IMHO, AU's magic system is the best implementation of a D&D-style magic system yet published. Sure. You could either run AU spellcasters side-by-side with regular D&D spellcasters each using their own rules, or convert the D&D spellcasters to AU-style readied spells and spell slots. I would recommend the former, although I think back when AU was first released somebody did the latter and came up with heightened and diminished versions of every spell in the PHB. No idea where that list would be now. [/QUOTE]

Verification