Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DWARF" data-source="post: 1008927" data-attributes="member: 863">I hate Clerics gaining spells and powers from gods.I HATE Vancian-style Fire-and-forget magical systems.I HATE a Good/Evil alignment system built into the foundation of the game.Some may say that these things are what makes DnD what it is.&nbsp; That may be to them, but to me the story has always been more important than the system.Now it seems that Monte's book will give me what I want.&nbsp; A game free from alignment, where people will have to think about ethics instead of looking to the DM and saying &quot;will killing XXXXX be an evil act right now?&quot;.&nbsp; I also will give me a game where spellcasters get their spells from a single unified spell pool, whether battle mage, healer or augur; where the gods do not commonly speak directly to people, telling them what is right and what to do.3.5 will be online and in a format that will allow me to easily cut and paste into my own house rules as necessary...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DWARF, post: 1008927, member: 863"] I hate Clerics gaining spells and powers from gods. I HATE Vancian-style Fire-and-forget magical systems. I [b]HATE[/b] a Good/Evil alignment system built into the foundation of the game. Some may say that these things are what makes DnD what it is. That may be to them, but to me the story has always been more important than the system. Now it seems that Monte's book will give me what I want. A game free from alignment, where people will have to think about ethics instead of looking to the DM and saying "will killing XXXXX be an evil act right now?". I also will give me a game where spellcasters get their spells from a single unified spell pool, whether battle mage, healer or augur; where the gods do not commonly speak directly to people, telling them what is right and what to do. 3.5 will be online and in a format that will allow me to easily cut and paste into my own house rules as necessary... [/QUOTE]

Verification