Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Arcana Unearthed: Pro's and Con's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iron_Chef" data-source="post: 1065130" data-attributes="member: 4530"><p><strong>Re: Re: Re: Re: Arcana Unearthed: Pro's and Con's</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, it makes perfect sense. Bad decor infringes on the quality of the meal by reducing the overall quality of the dining experience. </p><p></p><p>Would you be more likely to eat at a run-down greasy spoon in the bad part of town with bums and gangbangers out front or an upscale restaurant with pleasant atmosphere in a safe location? Unless you are either starving or destitute, chances are you'd go for a better looking place to eat, because there is the expectation that better atmosphere equals better food, even if it turns out not to be true. The same applies to films with great packaging but poor content. Are you going to buy/rent something unfamiliar that looks awful or something that looks all slick and pretty? Again, the expectation of quality is what drives sales/rentals/interest. If something looks like crap, but is actually good, it will probably still fail, because impulse buys/interest are negated. You can't pick it up and say to yourself, "Oh! this must be awesome!" Instead, it must succeed on word of mouth/reviews, which is possible, but improbable. In any event, chances are good it will not perform as well it could have if it had been packaged and promoted properly from the start.</p><p></p><p>If a product looks bad, it must <em>be</em> bad (regardless of its actual quality) in the eyes of the average consumer. That's how most consumers make buying decisions. </p><p></p><p>Q: Does item look cool? </p><p></p><p>If yes, obtain item. If cannot afford item, file under "buy later."</p><p></p><p>If no, move on to next item for "instant" evaluation.</p><p></p><p>Very few consumers have the luxury to sit down and carefully evaluate item after item based on actual content. If something doesn't grab them right from the start, they will generally move on until they A) find an item that grabs their attention (cover first, flip-through second, actual analysis of content third if at all), or B) find no items that meet their (possibly preconceived) expectations and leave the store empty-handed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iron_Chef, post: 1065130, member: 4530"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: Arcana Unearthed: Pro's and Con's[/b] Actually, it makes perfect sense. Bad decor infringes on the quality of the meal by reducing the overall quality of the dining experience. Would you be more likely to eat at a run-down greasy spoon in the bad part of town with bums and gangbangers out front or an upscale restaurant with pleasant atmosphere in a safe location? Unless you are either starving or destitute, chances are you'd go for a better looking place to eat, because there is the expectation that better atmosphere equals better food, even if it turns out not to be true. The same applies to films with great packaging but poor content. Are you going to buy/rent something unfamiliar that looks awful or something that looks all slick and pretty? Again, the expectation of quality is what drives sales/rentals/interest. If something looks like crap, but is actually good, it will probably still fail, because impulse buys/interest are negated. You can't pick it up and say to yourself, "Oh! this must be awesome!" Instead, it must succeed on word of mouth/reviews, which is possible, but improbable. In any event, chances are good it will not perform as well it could have if it had been packaged and promoted properly from the start. If a product looks bad, it must [i]be[/i] bad (regardless of its actual quality) in the eyes of the average consumer. That's how most consumers make buying decisions. Q: Does item look cool? If yes, obtain item. If cannot afford item, file under "buy later." If no, move on to next item for "instant" evaluation. Very few consumers have the luxury to sit down and carefully evaluate item after item based on actual content. If something doesn't grab them right from the start, they will generally move on until they A) find an item that grabs their attention (cover first, flip-through second, actual analysis of content third if at all), or B) find no items that meet their (possibly preconceived) expectations and leave the store empty-handed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Arcana Unearthed: Pro's and Con's
Top