Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="drnuncheon" data-source="post: 1067489" data-attributes="member: 96">I'm a little foggy on this whole point here.The races are compatible - you could bring them into a regular D&D game without a problem.Most of the classes are compatible. I'll bet you wouldn't even notice a huge difference if you used the D&D XP table for them instead of the The magic system is compatible - or as compatible as any "new magic system" could be.  It can be used side by side with the D&D magic system or it could replace it, either way with minimal effort.The changes to combat and skills are as compatible as any other house rules - of course they're going to have to replace what they were designed to replace.To me, the ultimate test of 'compatibility' would be to say something like this:"Can you run a game with PHB 3.0 races, AU classes/feats/magic system, and PHB 3.5 skills and combat?"  And the answer is "yes, you can".  "Can you run a game with PHB and AU races, the PHB fighter, rogue, and barbarian and the AU spellcasting classes, but without truenames?" "Sure."  How is that 'not compatible'?  There's a minimal amount of work you have to do for either of these, yes - just as there would be for introducing, say, the alternate classes from his BOEM2.What a lot of people seem to want is not rules compatability, but compatability with their particular campaign.  "This should slot seamlessly into my own personal world."  Since Monte doesn't game with most of us, that's difficult to accomplish...J</blockquote>

Verification