Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Arcana Unearthed: Pro's and Con's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeremy Ackerman-Yost" data-source="post: 1069126" data-attributes="member: 4720"><p>Where in the stat block does it say that, for example, the Sebbecai must have been created by giants? There is nothing in the mechanics which seems blatantly incompatible with D&D. This is entirely a flavor issue. You could just as easily use the exact same mechanics and say they were developed by natural selection, or are the descendents of Anubis' personal guard, who liked to sneak down to Earth for a quickie with mortal women. Why is this different than, for example, making gnomes in your world the result of an ancient dalliance between dwarves and fairies? Or making halflings into crazed, desert-dwelling barbarians?</p><p></p><p>Why is changing the underlying flavor assumptions of the WotC PHB somehow easier than changing the underlying flavor assumptions of AU?</p><p></p><p>It's not. It's a matter of personal preference. If you don't find the Sebbecai, for example, interesting enough to alter their backstory in order to fit your world (in the same way you might have done for gnomes, dwarves, or halflings), then that is the result of <strong>your personal preference</strong> and not <em>necessarily</em> a reflection of a lack of quality in the book.</p><p></p><p>Same thing with the classes. A number of reasonable suggestions have been put forward for the Akashic mechanics to fit into a world without breaking the existing cosmology. At worst, it would be a minor "behind the scenes" (or maybe "behind the screen") change which would be completely invisible to players unless they really chose to look into it. And in a world where a <em>geas</em> can be forced upon someone, who's to say that some diety or power wouldn't be impressed enough with someone who voluntarily took on a oath to give them the powers of an Oathsworn? It's never happened before? OK. Simple answer: someone just figured out how to draw sufficient power and attention to himself to pull it off. Evil necromancers are always figuring out new ways to empower themselves or bring about the apocalypse. Why can't someone else figure out a way to harness a previously untapped power to some other end? And maybe a diety of death got sick and tired of LG dieties having the lock on champions of faith in the form of paladins and decided to empower a few Champions of Death. That's a campaign right there, actually. Heck, all of the classes seem a LOT easier to fit into vanilla D&D than psionics, IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeremy Ackerman-Yost, post: 1069126, member: 4720"] Where in the stat block does it say that, for example, the Sebbecai must have been created by giants? There is nothing in the mechanics which seems blatantly incompatible with D&D. This is entirely a flavor issue. You could just as easily use the exact same mechanics and say they were developed by natural selection, or are the descendents of Anubis' personal guard, who liked to sneak down to Earth for a quickie with mortal women. Why is this different than, for example, making gnomes in your world the result of an ancient dalliance between dwarves and fairies? Or making halflings into crazed, desert-dwelling barbarians? Why is changing the underlying flavor assumptions of the WotC PHB somehow easier than changing the underlying flavor assumptions of AU? It's not. It's a matter of personal preference. If you don't find the Sebbecai, for example, interesting enough to alter their backstory in order to fit your world (in the same way you might have done for gnomes, dwarves, or halflings), then that is the result of [b]your personal preference[/b] and not [i]necessarily[/i] a reflection of a lack of quality in the book. Same thing with the classes. A number of reasonable suggestions have been put forward for the Akashic mechanics to fit into a world without breaking the existing cosmology. At worst, it would be a minor "behind the scenes" (or maybe "behind the screen") change which would be completely invisible to players unless they really chose to look into it. And in a world where a [i]geas[/i] can be forced upon someone, who's to say that some diety or power wouldn't be impressed enough with someone who voluntarily took on a oath to give them the powers of an Oathsworn? It's never happened before? OK. Simple answer: someone just figured out how to draw sufficient power and attention to himself to pull it off. Evil necromancers are always figuring out new ways to empower themselves or bring about the apocalypse. Why can't someone else figure out a way to harness a previously untapped power to some other end? And maybe a diety of death got sick and tired of LG dieties having the lock on champions of faith in the form of paladins and decided to empower a few Champions of Death. That's a campaign right there, actually. Heck, all of the classes seem a LOT easier to fit into vanilla D&D than psionics, IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Arcana Unearthed: Pro's and Con's
Top