Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wombat" data-source="post: 2083933" data-attributes="member: 8447">My current campaign uses the races, classes and spells out of AU, although none of the background material.  But that is kinda normal for me & my games -- I always like making my own worlds.  This means that the relationships between certain of the races has altered, though this has not caused any significant problems.  My players love the Litorians and the Quickling Faen, though most of them are still Human.  Overall, the group is having a great time with it, but they have complained that they want the Rogue back in, due to his trap finding capabilities (so far I have left very few traps for them, so it hasn't been as much of a problem).  We did add in Monte's Bard from The Complete Book of Eldritch Might and it fits rather neatly; we are considering adding back in the Rogue, but that will wait until the next session for a vote. At first they were very nervous about learning a new magic system, but now no one wants to go back to the PHB rules -- Magisters are simply prefered over Wizards and Sorcerers and no one really misses the Arcane/Divine dividing line in magic.  There has been some rolling of eyes over the fact that the initial "utility damage spell" is Mudball, but other than that they love the flexibility of the magic system.  In the aggregate, none of my players want to go back to the core books.  They prefer the races and more particularly the classes in AU to those in the PHB.  One saga's story  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification