Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gez" data-source="post: 2179775" data-attributes="member: 1328">OK, suppose you are an arcane spellcaster (anything from bard to wu jen), and you have the Arcane Disciple feat (cf. Complete Divine) for the Cold or Winter domain, both of which are from Frostburn. Simple enough.Would that entitle you to take the Artic Priest feat?ARTIC PRIEST [GENERAL] You can swap out prepared spells to cast spells to aid in exploring and surviving in frostfell areas. Prerequisite: Access to Cold or Winter cleric domain. Benefit: You can channel stored spell energy into spells that aid in exploring and surviving in the frostfell, even if you did not prepare these spells ahead of time. You can "lose" any prepared spell that is not a domain spell in order to cast any of the spells that appear on the list below, as long as the spell to be cast is of an equal or lower level to the one you lose. Spells you can spontaneously cast when using this feat include: control weather, create food and water, endure elements, heroes' feast, hibernate, protection from energy, and resist energy.I'd be tempted to say that, according to the RAW, it is valid, but bards and sorcerers (and other spontaneous spellcasters, like assassins or warmages) would have to take the Spell Preparation feat, which is kinda strange for a prerequisite to spontaneous casting.Your opinion?The crux of the question is: "does the Arcane Disciple feat give access to a domain?"I can see arguments for the yes and for the no, so I don't know.</blockquote>

Verification