Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcane Divine dual-casting classes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kitcik" data-source="post: 5699250" data-attributes="member: 98256"><p>The fact that [MENTION=6674931]Jimlock[/MENTION] says your views are unsupported is immaterial.</p><p> </p><p>The fact that they are, in fact, unsupported is quite material. If you disagree with this, offer some support other than what you feel is logical. In other words, offer a rule. The rules as quoted throughout this thread support only one conclusion, logical or not: if you have a prerequisite feat, you qualify for the relevant PrC, whether or not you can currently use that feat.</p><p> </p><p>In some cases, as some [like [MENTION=78958]Empirate[/MENTION] ] have pointed out, that is logical. In some cases, as you have pointed out, it is not.</p><p> </p><p>However, in any case, those are the rules.</p><p> </p><p>Here is one more thought. Say you had a ring that granted the following ability: "While you wear this ring, you are treated as having the Power Attack feat for purposes of qualifying for PrCs. However, while wearing this ring, you may not use the Power Attack feat, whether or not you have taken it and regardless of your strength." Seems to me this would work for certain, regardless of logic. Seems to me the RAW are analogous to this for PrC feat prerequisites.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kitcik, post: 5699250, member: 98256"] The fact that [MENTION=6674931]Jimlock[/MENTION] says your views are unsupported is immaterial. The fact that they are, in fact, unsupported is quite material. If you disagree with this, offer some support other than what you feel is logical. In other words, offer a rule. The rules as quoted throughout this thread support only one conclusion, logical or not: if you have a prerequisite feat, you qualify for the relevant PrC, whether or not you can currently use that feat. In some cases, as some [like [MENTION=78958]Empirate[/MENTION] ] have pointed out, that is logical. In some cases, as you have pointed out, it is not. However, in any case, those are the rules. Here is one more thought. Say you had a ring that granted the following ability: "While you wear this ring, you are treated as having the Power Attack feat for purposes of qualifying for PrCs. However, while wearing this ring, you may not use the Power Attack feat, whether or not you have taken it and regardless of your strength." Seems to me this would work for certain, regardless of logic. Seems to me the RAW are analogous to this for PrC feat prerequisites. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcane Divine dual-casting classes
Top