Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Badwe" data-source="post: 4762148" data-attributes="member: 61762">Interesting that someone else pointed out magic. You know, in magic they often get upset when NEW art is used over their old favorites.  Also, the art in magic isn’t really a good fit for D&D, the cards are illustrated such that they stand out as a 3”x3” picture flopped down on a table, they lack miniscule details like a big D&D piece of art would have.Other posters seem to have implied that budgets for a book, even wotc, are razor thin as is, don’t squeeze them any tighter guys.  Nobody complains about recycled art in galleries or art history books, if it’s good it’s worth reprinting.  Is it recycling when a novel quotes a poem or when a speaker quotes another orator? If the content is good and fits with the overall piece, a familiar and iconic selection is superior to something new and unfamiliar. Furthermore, can we please stop affixing the “humor” tag to veiled criticism of wotc? Just because you think you’re funny doesn’t mean the rest of the forum agrees.  Nobody here is an insightful satirist and it’s… getting… old.</blockquote>