Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ashtagon" data-source="post: 5688055" data-attributes="member: 72335">Here's some quotes from that sidebar you mentioned:So, that very same sidebar specifically says only ten true dragons were described in the Monster Manual. Kobolds are in the MM, but aren't noted in that paragraph as true dragons. But it also refers us to a list of true dragons in its appendix. Let's flip the pages and look at page 286-8... nope, no kobolds there either (dragonwrought or otherwise).Essentially, anywhere there is a list of creatures that are true dragons, there is also a notable lack of kobolds.Also, the Dragon Wrought feat from RotD does not say the character becomes a true dragon -- merely that he gains the dragon type.If you took an actual true dragon and applied the necropolitan template as your character build does, he'd lose the dragon type anyway, and thus would automatically lose the status of being a true dragon.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ashtagon, post: 5688055, member: 72335"] Here's some quotes from that sidebar you mentioned: So, that very same sidebar specifically says only ten true dragons were described in the [I]Monster Manual[/I]. Kobolds are in the MM, but aren't noted in that paragraph as true dragons. But it also refers us to a list of true dragons in its appendix. Let's flip the pages and look at page 286-8... nope, no kobolds there either (dragonwrought or otherwise). Essentially, anywhere there is a list of creatures that are true dragons, there is also a notable lack of kobolds. Also, the Dragon Wrought feat from RotD does not say the character becomes a true dragon -- merely that he gains the dragon type. If you took an actual true dragon and applied the necropolitan template as your character build does, he'd lose the dragon type anyway, and thus would automatically lose the status of being a true dragon. [/QUOTE]

Verification