Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcane Spell Failure fix/removal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 2015545" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>The benefit would clearly be to discourage dipping into Fighter (or another combat class) for all the proficiencies in 1 level.</p><p></p><p>The lack of ASF would benefit characters who are either Fighter/Wizard, in which case they are already kinda weak in spellcasting (unless you allow Eldritch Knight or similar PrCl) and would normally have a HARD time casting in heavy armor, or who have spent 3 feats which is a huge price IMHO.</p><p></p><p>Also, light armors can on the average (unless they have large bonuses or special abilities) be disregarded by a caster who knows Mage Armor, so the problem is rather relative to medium and heavy armor.</p><p></p><p>That said, I think your idea should be fine, but be sure to KEEP ASF for characters without the proficiency. You know, a wizard CAN wear heavy armor without the proficiency: he suffers ACP to attacks also, but if he's not casting rays or touch spells, he may not care at all. Therefore, you should make the "no ASF" a benefit of the proficiencies, rather than a general rule.</p><p></p><p>If you find out that medium/heavy armor are still pretty good for wizards even with your house rules, you can switch ASF with a Concentration check which is usually much lighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 2015545, member: 1465"] The benefit would clearly be to discourage dipping into Fighter (or another combat class) for all the proficiencies in 1 level. The lack of ASF would benefit characters who are either Fighter/Wizard, in which case they are already kinda weak in spellcasting (unless you allow Eldritch Knight or similar PrCl) and would normally have a HARD time casting in heavy armor, or who have spent 3 feats which is a huge price IMHO. Also, light armors can on the average (unless they have large bonuses or special abilities) be disregarded by a caster who knows Mage Armor, so the problem is rather relative to medium and heavy armor. That said, I think your idea should be fine, but be sure to KEEP ASF for characters without the proficiency. You know, a wizard CAN wear heavy armor without the proficiency: he suffers ACP to attacks also, but if he's not casting rays or touch spells, he may not care at all. Therefore, you should make the "no ASF" a benefit of the proficiencies, rather than a general rule. If you find out that medium/heavy armor are still pretty good for wizards even with your house rules, you can switch ASF with a Concentration check which is usually much lighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcane Spell Failure fix/removal
Top