Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcanist playtest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5626640" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Yes, you are correct, but you are committing a fundamental error. You are theorycrafting. The situation you describe is a BLANK SLATE battlefield where there is no terrain, no circumstances which might make the goblins desire to be HERE instead of THERE, etc. This is simply not a useful line of reasoning. All you'll end up with is the conclusion that all controllers are crap and everyone should just play a striker instead. Again, this is correct for your 'marble world' theorycrafting scenario. No wizard will be worth squat compared to a striker who can just lay in the damage that has to be done anyway. (actually even in marble world this isn't ENTIRELY true, and some powers will still work relatively well, but they aren't generally movable zones). </p><p></p><p>The point is that in the real world when the goblins are trying to crowd through the door that lets them flank the fighter in his covered position then dropping a flaming sphere in that area and chasing the goblins away ain't a bad idea and can be VASTLY more tactically advantageous than just trying to kill them outright. </p><p></p><p>Now, consider a situation where a bunch of artillery monsters are bombing the party from a position you cannot get to. The old Flaming Sphere really does nothing here. The DM is going to just leave the monsters in their relatively secure location knowing that moving them is pointless. With the NEW Flaming Sphere the DM has a meaningful choice, stand around in the inaccessible location and take damage or move and risk being engaged by the party melee characters. In this case the NEW FS may actually perform better. It won't be much worse in any case. </p><p></p><p>Notice that this also conforms with what Balesir is saying too, if you move damage to EOT and you WANT to keep the power at the same level then you'd be advised to increase the damage or add some other effect. In truth FS was rather awesome and a bit of a nerf probably won't hurt it. However the 2nd consideration still exists, the damage may simply not be enough to ever motivate the enemy to move at all, but there's no general way to determine that. FS is unlikely to exert much control at higher levels as 1d4+int damage may be trivial (even with some boosts), but then again it is a level 1 daily and isn't intended to be a go-to spell at higher levels. Chances are you'll swap it out at the first power swap and may even retrain it sooner than that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5626640, member: 82106"] Yes, you are correct, but you are committing a fundamental error. You are theorycrafting. The situation you describe is a BLANK SLATE battlefield where there is no terrain, no circumstances which might make the goblins desire to be HERE instead of THERE, etc. This is simply not a useful line of reasoning. All you'll end up with is the conclusion that all controllers are crap and everyone should just play a striker instead. Again, this is correct for your 'marble world' theorycrafting scenario. No wizard will be worth squat compared to a striker who can just lay in the damage that has to be done anyway. (actually even in marble world this isn't ENTIRELY true, and some powers will still work relatively well, but they aren't generally movable zones). The point is that in the real world when the goblins are trying to crowd through the door that lets them flank the fighter in his covered position then dropping a flaming sphere in that area and chasing the goblins away ain't a bad idea and can be VASTLY more tactically advantageous than just trying to kill them outright. Now, consider a situation where a bunch of artillery monsters are bombing the party from a position you cannot get to. The old Flaming Sphere really does nothing here. The DM is going to just leave the monsters in their relatively secure location knowing that moving them is pointless. With the NEW Flaming Sphere the DM has a meaningful choice, stand around in the inaccessible location and take damage or move and risk being engaged by the party melee characters. In this case the NEW FS may actually perform better. It won't be much worse in any case. Notice that this also conforms with what Balesir is saying too, if you move damage to EOT and you WANT to keep the power at the same level then you'd be advised to increase the damage or add some other effect. In truth FS was rather awesome and a bit of a nerf probably won't hurt it. However the 2nd consideration still exists, the damage may simply not be enough to ever motivate the enemy to move at all, but there's no general way to determine that. FS is unlikely to exert much control at higher levels as 1d4+int damage may be trivial (even with some boosts), but then again it is a level 1 daily and isn't intended to be a go-to spell at higher levels. Chances are you'll swap it out at the first power swap and may even retrain it sooner than that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcanist playtest
Top