Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcanist playtest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5637140" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>The fact that a few minutes of searching turned up multiple threads on the topic, several of which involves folks mentioning it as a known issue in the community?</p><p> </p><p>I don't think that is <em>reason </em>for WotC to make the change - input from the community is just one piece of information, not a mandate. But I think it is enough for them to examine the power to see if change is warranted. Which they apparently did, and came to the conclusion that it was. </p><p> </p><p>Which I approve of - not because of community discussion of it, but because of my own experiences with the power and its clear need to be balanced with other wizard powers of that level. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Just to be clear, again, I don't think that disagreeing is an issue at all! It's the comments about "it's only a minority" that feels this way (or, previously, no one at all), insisting that no one had ever commented or discussed issues with the power before, that all of this is the result of poor playtesting (rather than a response to community feedback), etc. </p><p> </p><p>Anyway, I don't want to start dragging this off into tangents, so if you feel otherwise, fair enough. I just wanted to clarify my point and encourage you to at least acknowledge the existence of these opinions, even if you disagree with them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5637140, member: 61155"] The fact that a few minutes of searching turned up multiple threads on the topic, several of which involves folks mentioning it as a known issue in the community? I don't think that is [I]reason [/I]for WotC to make the change - input from the community is just one piece of information, not a mandate. But I think it is enough for them to examine the power to see if change is warranted. Which they apparently did, and came to the conclusion that it was. Which I approve of - not because of community discussion of it, but because of my own experiences with the power and its clear need to be balanced with other wizard powers of that level. Just to be clear, again, I don't think that disagreeing is an issue at all! It's the comments about "it's only a minority" that feels this way (or, previously, no one at all), insisting that no one had ever commented or discussed issues with the power before, that all of this is the result of poor playtesting (rather than a response to community feedback), etc. Anyway, I don't want to start dragging this off into tangents, so if you feel otherwise, fair enough. I just wanted to clarify my point and encourage you to at least acknowledge the existence of these opinions, even if you disagree with them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arcanist playtest
Top