Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Morgan_Scott82" data-source="post: 4585244" data-attributes="member: 79594">I see this as an issue with rogues not having a viable ranged option, that doesn't mean rangers shouldn't have a viable ranged option. I blame the Stealth skill errata from taking the ranged option away from rogues, but I don't have a problem with archery rangers, hell I think rogues should be able to use shortbows. Just because there isn't a ranged rogues doesn't mean the archery ranger should be bad at doing exactly what the player wants and has built his character to do in the name of fairness.  What if that's exactly what the player thinks is fun about the archery ranger, what if they don't especially enjoy thinking tactically and want a character they can put somewhere and reliably contribute to the party without having to think much. What if they want to play the daring wilderness sniper, who could put an arrow through a keyring at 200 paces. Neither of those things are facilitated or made more fun by your proposed change. I guess what I'm saying is different players find different things fun, because something isn't fun for you doesn't mean that isn't precisely what attracts someone else to that particular class.</blockquote>