Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Archery - Not cover nor engaged penalty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GhostHawke" data-source="post: 24462" data-attributes="member: 2306"><p><strong>A little something on Ranged Attacks</strong></p><p></p><p>Well, where to start... As for the cover issue, because the Barbarian is out of the flight path of the arrows (or bolts)– he’s standing to the side – cover would not apply here.</p><p></p><p> As for the –4 penalty for the Barbarian being engaged in melee with the monster, this would still apply. While the PHB says that “if you shoot or throw a ranged weapon at a target that is engaged in melee with an ally, you suffer a –4 penalty on your attack roll because you have to aim carefully to avoid hitting your ally” (pg. 124). The term “your ally” should be interpreted as a lucid one; a more general term “combatant” can replace it. Being engaged in melee is determined if one or the other combatant threatens the other (although this penalty is limited to a threatening range of 10 ft.).</p><p></p><p> So following through with this train of thought, if a PC were to enter into combat where two creatures were fighting, and a PC wanted to attack one of the monsters but not hit the other, then the –4 penalty would still apply here. This is so even though neither of the two creatures were the PC’s “ally” – the rest of the condition set above is accomplished, trying to avoid hitting the non-targeted creature. Now if the PC’s did not care which of the creatures were hit, I’d suggest one of two methods. Either use a 50% chance to attack one of the two (and scale however you wish, for multiple targets and/or creature size) or attack whichever of the two are closer to the attacker (if you choose to do the latter, follow the rules for the variant rule mentioned below. If they are both equally far away, roll 50-50).</p><p></p><p> Finally, to satisfy the curiosity of anyone wanting greater accuracy for ranged weapons, I’d suggest using the “Variant: Firing into a Crowd” that can be found on pg. 65-66 in the DMG. This should take care of any stray missiles and help answer other range weapon questions (This can also be used to determine where a missile goes if it misses by the -4, which would still apply even to a ranged touch attack I believe).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GhostHawke, post: 24462, member: 2306"] [b]A little something on Ranged Attacks[/b] Well, where to start... As for the cover issue, because the Barbarian is out of the flight path of the arrows (or bolts)– he’s standing to the side – cover would not apply here. As for the –4 penalty for the Barbarian being engaged in melee with the monster, this would still apply. While the PHB says that “if you shoot or throw a ranged weapon at a target that is engaged in melee with an ally, you suffer a –4 penalty on your attack roll because you have to aim carefully to avoid hitting your ally” (pg. 124). The term “your ally” should be interpreted as a lucid one; a more general term “combatant” can replace it. Being engaged in melee is determined if one or the other combatant threatens the other (although this penalty is limited to a threatening range of 10 ft.). So following through with this train of thought, if a PC were to enter into combat where two creatures were fighting, and a PC wanted to attack one of the monsters but not hit the other, then the –4 penalty would still apply here. This is so even though neither of the two creatures were the PC’s “ally” – the rest of the condition set above is accomplished, trying to avoid hitting the non-targeted creature. Now if the PC’s did not care which of the creatures were hit, I’d suggest one of two methods. Either use a 50% chance to attack one of the two (and scale however you wish, for multiple targets and/or creature size) or attack whichever of the two are closer to the attacker (if you choose to do the latter, follow the rules for the variant rule mentioned below. If they are both equally far away, roll 50-50). Finally, to satisfy the curiosity of anyone wanting greater accuracy for ranged weapons, I’d suggest using the “Variant: Firing into a Crowd” that can be found on pg. 65-66 in the DMG. This should take care of any stray missiles and help answer other range weapon questions (This can also be used to determine where a missile goes if it misses by the -4, which would still apply even to a ranged touch attack I believe). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Archery - Not cover nor engaged penalty
Top