Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Archivists with Wizard spells. Effects?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sound of Azure" data-source="post: 3402607" data-attributes="member: 40749"><p>Maybe so. It does seem more thematic for a scholar type.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have a point, although it's not quite true. The archivists will be able to get hold of "druid" spells by interacting with the Spirit Shamans (who use spells from the druid list) and Shugenjas (who have their own spell list).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Heh, me too.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's an interesting idea. I didn't notice that they had a good Fort save. That's just not right. Anyway, I've been tossing up the idea of eliminating the divine/arcane split. It's where this idea came from in the first place.</p><p></p><p>As for the M:tg splits of spell schools... interesting. It could work well.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Good point. All of the learned spells should be of the same type. If I implement Nifft's idea, above, mystic theurges will not exist (since there would be no arcane/divine split).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I think that's a must. It's starting to sound more like a wizard with the Archivist's class abilities instead. That's not a bad thing, though. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>Re: bardic knowledge, I was comparing it slightly to the cloistered cleric's lore ability. It would be nice to have a back up for times when the archivist's prodigious Knowledge skills actually fail them (unlikely, but it could happen).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Expanded knowledge? Hmmm, it doesn't quite sit right with me either. </p><p></p><p>The main restriction seems to be the monetary cost of scribing the spells. While spellbook scribing will likely be cheaper in my game, there'll be less available gold, too. </p><p></p><p>It sounds like it makes more sense to give the archivist free access the wizard list (that is, their free spells come from this list). Access to other spells must come from scrolls andbe scribed into the spellbook.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the help. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>So:</p><p></p><p>Archivist</p><p>d6 hd, good Will save, poor base attack bonus.</p><p>No armour proficiency (spell failure in armour). Wizard weapon proficiency.</p><p>At 1st level, access to all 0-level Wizard spells and 3 ist-level wizard spells. Gets two free wizard spells at every level; an scribe scrolls he comes across into his spellbook.</p><p>Scribe Scroll at 1st level</p><p>Lore (same as bardic knowledge)</p><p>Dark knowledge</p><p>Lore Mastery (at level 2, 7, 13, and 17)</p><p>Still Mind at 4th level</p><p>Bonus Feats at level 10 and 20.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sound of Azure, post: 3402607, member: 40749"] Maybe so. It does seem more thematic for a scholar type. You have a point, although it's not quite true. The archivists will be able to get hold of "druid" spells by interacting with the Spirit Shamans (who use spells from the druid list) and Shugenjas (who have their own spell list). Heh, me too. That's an interesting idea. I didn't notice that they had a good Fort save. That's just not right. Anyway, I've been tossing up the idea of eliminating the divine/arcane split. It's where this idea came from in the first place. As for the M:tg splits of spell schools... interesting. It could work well. Good point. All of the learned spells should be of the same type. If I implement Nifft's idea, above, mystic theurges will not exist (since there would be no arcane/divine split). Yeah, I think that's a must. It's starting to sound more like a wizard with the Archivist's class abilities instead. That's not a bad thing, though. :) Re: bardic knowledge, I was comparing it slightly to the cloistered cleric's lore ability. It would be nice to have a back up for times when the archivist's prodigious Knowledge skills actually fail them (unlikely, but it could happen). Expanded knowledge? Hmmm, it doesn't quite sit right with me either. The main restriction seems to be the monetary cost of scribing the spells. While spellbook scribing will likely be cheaper in my game, there'll be less available gold, too. It sounds like it makes more sense to give the archivist free access the wizard list (that is, their free spells come from this list). Access to other spells must come from scrolls andbe scribed into the spellbook. Thanks for the help. :) --- So: Archivist d6 hd, good Will save, poor base attack bonus. No armour proficiency (spell failure in armour). Wizard weapon proficiency. At 1st level, access to all 0-level Wizard spells and 3 ist-level wizard spells. Gets two free wizard spells at every level; an scribe scrolls he comes across into his spellbook. Scribe Scroll at 1st level Lore (same as bardic knowledge) Dark knowledge Lore Mastery (at level 2, 7, 13, and 17) Still Mind at 4th level Bonus Feats at level 10 and 20. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Archivists with Wizard spells. Effects?
Top