Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="brehobit" data-source="post: 3055984" data-attributes="member: 12032">I see this a lot and don't understand it.I think the point is that an archer is MUCH better than a warlock at what the warlock is supose to be best at with that rule.  Remember a warlock only gets one shot off per round.  At 11th level its a 5d6 blast (I think) averaging 17.5 damage and probably a minor effect vs. 3-4 arrows each doing 10-15 points of damage and able to ignore SR.  And with a much better range.  The lower numbers are for a melee fighter with a strenght bow and no feats.  Heck, the _warlock_ will do more damage with the bow than his blast.If you are going to do that, I'd at the _least_ argue for the ability to bypass SR, and also argue for iterative attacks.  I'd _still_ avoid the warlock at that point though.Mark</blockquote>