Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are 5e Saving Throws Boring?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7853439" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>There's a lot of good food for thoughts in this thread...</p><p></p><p>IIRC, the OP's idea is that saving throws can be boring if they don't have enough dramatic consequences for failure.</p><p></p><p>The focus on the discussion is then maybe shifted towards <em>mechanics</em> but clearly it's also about the <em>narrative</em>. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I don't think it really made a difference when they replaced saving throws rolled by the target with spell checks rolled by the caster. It might feel better for a player to roll the dice for the spells she cast instead of having the DM roll for the target, but what about when the target is the PC? Does the player now feel better that instead of being told "roll a saving throw" the DM simply announces "you're paralyzed/petrified/dead, I just rolled it behind the screen"? Instead, if the players really always want to roll, then a variant rule that works differently in the two cases would be better (that is, use saving throws when the PC is the target, use spell checks when the PC is the caster).</p><p></p><p>Anyway, IMHO saving throws were defensive in nature since the early days of D&D exactly because from a <em>narrative </em>point of view it's more about how the target defends herself from the effect, than how the effect is delivered.</p><p></p><p>Let me try to elaborate...</p><p></p><p>With a <strong>weapon attack</strong>, there is some (small) room for narrating the attack action. I suppose in most cases players just say "I shoot an arrow/swing my sword". But if they want, they can slightly flourish their description e.g. "I lounge and stab my sword to the orc's chest" rather than "I swing widely at the orc" or even "I bang the orc's head". The default core game of D&D never had called shot, so it doesn't really matter to aim at the head or something else, but at least you can <em>describe</em> it if you want. The target can also describe how eventually manages <em>not</em> to get hit, even if AC is static and not rolled: you can describe it either as dodging the blow, the armor absorbing it, the shield intercepting it, the target's weapon deflecting it... I guess every gaming group has their preference on whether describing every attack or not (or maybe only the important ones), but my remark here is that there is room for description on either side. Note that there are games where the defender also rolls, but from a mathematical point of you one roll is enough.</p><p></p><p>With a <strong>spell attack</strong> IMHO the narrative room is a lot more on the target. Say that a spellcaster is casting a Fireball, how much room for narrative do you have on the caster's side beyond "I hurl the Fireball"? On the other hand, there is more room for description on how the target saves: "I hide behind by shield", "I crouch down", "I dodge the flames", "I just shrug it off, I don't care if it burns!". In theory spells should be complicated, but I can't really think of a way to vary the narrative of the casting itself. I can flourish the description of the gestures or even come up with verbal components, but these are not exactly what make the spell succeed or fail... it's what the target does!</p><p></p><p>That said, of course what happens <em>after</em> the casting can be boring depending also on the mechanics... but here things get complicated. Some gaming groups will be bored by having too frequent characters deaths/sucks, and other gaming groups will be bored by having too rare characters deaths/sucks! Very hard to find a setup that works for everyone... it even depends on how many encounters per day, and how often your monsters cast spells at all.</p><p></p><p>One small (old) tip that comes to my mind is... don't tell the players what they're rolling a save for <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Drop some fancy description such as "you suddenly feel an unearthly shiver through your spine, as if your life essence is drained away... make a Con save!". Not knowing in advance can make it scary, "please let it not be Finger of Death..." and when they fail they'll be relieved if it's only a minor effect.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 7853439, member: 1465"] There's a lot of good food for thoughts in this thread... IIRC, the OP's idea is that saving throws can be boring if they don't have enough dramatic consequences for failure. The focus on the discussion is then maybe shifted towards [I]mechanics[/I] but clearly it's also about the [I]narrative[/I]. Personally, I don't think it really made a difference when they replaced saving throws rolled by the target with spell checks rolled by the caster. It might feel better for a player to roll the dice for the spells she cast instead of having the DM roll for the target, but what about when the target is the PC? Does the player now feel better that instead of being told "roll a saving throw" the DM simply announces "you're paralyzed/petrified/dead, I just rolled it behind the screen"? Instead, if the players really always want to roll, then a variant rule that works differently in the two cases would be better (that is, use saving throws when the PC is the target, use spell checks when the PC is the caster). Anyway, IMHO saving throws were defensive in nature since the early days of D&D exactly because from a [I]narrative [/I]point of view it's more about how the target defends herself from the effect, than how the effect is delivered. Let me try to elaborate... With a [B]weapon attack[/B], there is some (small) room for narrating the attack action. I suppose in most cases players just say "I shoot an arrow/swing my sword". But if they want, they can slightly flourish their description e.g. "I lounge and stab my sword to the orc's chest" rather than "I swing widely at the orc" or even "I bang the orc's head". The default core game of D&D never had called shot, so it doesn't really matter to aim at the head or something else, but at least you can [I]describe[/I] it if you want. The target can also describe how eventually manages [I]not[/I] to get hit, even if AC is static and not rolled: you can describe it either as dodging the blow, the armor absorbing it, the shield intercepting it, the target's weapon deflecting it... I guess every gaming group has their preference on whether describing every attack or not (or maybe only the important ones), but my remark here is that there is room for description on either side. Note that there are games where the defender also rolls, but from a mathematical point of you one roll is enough. With a [B]spell attack[/B] IMHO the narrative room is a lot more on the target. Say that a spellcaster is casting a Fireball, how much room for narrative do you have on the caster's side beyond "I hurl the Fireball"? On the other hand, there is more room for description on how the target saves: "I hide behind by shield", "I crouch down", "I dodge the flames", "I just shrug it off, I don't care if it burns!". In theory spells should be complicated, but I can't really think of a way to vary the narrative of the casting itself. I can flourish the description of the gestures or even come up with verbal components, but these are not exactly what make the spell succeed or fail... it's what the target does! That said, of course what happens [I]after[/I] the casting can be boring depending also on the mechanics... but here things get complicated. Some gaming groups will be bored by having too frequent characters deaths/sucks, and other gaming groups will be bored by having too rare characters deaths/sucks! Very hard to find a setup that works for everyone... it even depends on how many encounters per day, and how often your monsters cast spells at all. One small (old) tip that comes to my mind is... don't tell the players what they're rolling a save for :) Drop some fancy description such as "you suddenly feel an unearthly shiver through your spine, as if your life essence is drained away... make a Con save!". Not knowing in advance can make it scary, "please let it not be Finger of Death..." and when they fail they'll be relieved if it's only a minor effect. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are 5e Saving Throws Boring?
Top