Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are Archer Rangers getting the Shaft?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corvinus" data-source="post: 4677825" data-attributes="member: 82603"><p>1. Archer rangers are seemingly intended to be glass cannons.</p><p> </p><p>2. Our group's tests of them indicate that they do FAR more damage than any other build our party has yet tested. It's just not even close.</p><p> </p><p>3. Archer rangers have abilities to avoid melee opponents that no other glass cannon (see: Wizard) enjoys. By level 6, my archer ranger with Weave Through the Fray and Yield Ground can seriously bedevil pursuing attackers while turning them into pincushions with his sheer damage output.</p><p> </p><p>4. Archer rangers have a natural synergy between their DEX for attack and DEX for AC and Reflex that is not enjoyed by dual-wield rangers. In fact, the dual-wield ranger was significantly more difficult to make competitive until I forgot about DEX entirely (set it to 8) and dumped into armor feats instead. Hell, the only attributes an archer ranger even needs are DEX, WIS, and CON (in that order). This conveniently gives them bonuses to all four defensive types as well as bonus hit points and surges. This more than makes up for the lack of the Toughness feat, seeing as they shouldn't even be in melee to start with.</p><p> </p><p>5. Archer rangers can avoid melee VASTLY more easily than laser clerics (range 5), warlocks (range 10) and wizards (range 10). Your -close- range is a multiple of their -max- ranges.</p><p> </p><p>6. I don't know about anyone else... but what chances we've had to test archer rangers, it is indeed very rare to see them in melee combat. Where it has happened, there were ways for them to slip the combat while the tanks used marks and other means to regain the attention of enemies. Hordes of ranged attackers concentrating fire on an archer ranger was vastly more dangerous.</p><p> </p><p>Mind you... they are a bit glass cannon-like. If your archer ranger gets surrounded by big tough melee brutes that your friends can't shake off of you, you're toast.</p><p> </p><p>Now... by contrast...</p><p> </p><p>Melee rangers have, at least in my experience, a much rougher time of things. They typically have less AC (unless you dump DEX and invest in armor feats), less Reflex, are more susceptible to being whacked on in melee when they're so much more attractive as a target than your tanks, and other liabilities.</p><p> </p><p>Maybe there's something I'm missing, but our group's tests of both builds have seemed to indicate that the archers were -vastly- superior.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corvinus, post: 4677825, member: 82603"] 1. Archer rangers are seemingly intended to be glass cannons. 2. Our group's tests of them indicate that they do FAR more damage than any other build our party has yet tested. It's just not even close. 3. Archer rangers have abilities to avoid melee opponents that no other glass cannon (see: Wizard) enjoys. By level 6, my archer ranger with Weave Through the Fray and Yield Ground can seriously bedevil pursuing attackers while turning them into pincushions with his sheer damage output. 4. Archer rangers have a natural synergy between their DEX for attack and DEX for AC and Reflex that is not enjoyed by dual-wield rangers. In fact, the dual-wield ranger was significantly more difficult to make competitive until I forgot about DEX entirely (set it to 8) and dumped into armor feats instead. Hell, the only attributes an archer ranger even needs are DEX, WIS, and CON (in that order). This conveniently gives them bonuses to all four defensive types as well as bonus hit points and surges. This more than makes up for the lack of the Toughness feat, seeing as they shouldn't even be in melee to start with. 5. Archer rangers can avoid melee VASTLY more easily than laser clerics (range 5), warlocks (range 10) and wizards (range 10). Your -close- range is a multiple of their -max- ranges. 6. I don't know about anyone else... but what chances we've had to test archer rangers, it is indeed very rare to see them in melee combat. Where it has happened, there were ways for them to slip the combat while the tanks used marks and other means to regain the attention of enemies. Hordes of ranged attackers concentrating fire on an archer ranger was vastly more dangerous. Mind you... they are a bit glass cannon-like. If your archer ranger gets surrounded by big tough melee brutes that your friends can't shake off of you, you're toast. Now... by contrast... Melee rangers have, at least in my experience, a much rougher time of things. They typically have less AC (unless you dump DEX and invest in armor feats), less Reflex, are more susceptible to being whacked on in melee when they're so much more attractive as a target than your tanks, and other liabilities. Maybe there's something I'm missing, but our group's tests of both builds have seemed to indicate that the archers were -vastly- superior. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are Archer Rangers getting the Shaft?
Top