Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are Barbarian’s “Meh”
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coroc" data-source="post: 7872966" data-attributes="member: 6895991"><p>I was just referring to the pike, which [USER=6704184]@doctorbadwolf[/USER] considered to be an archetypical barbarian weapon but he cleared that up to be a long spear instead.</p><p>I house rule spear anyway to be a 1d8 two handed 5ft reach weapon whith which you can apply PM in my games, so, no in a normal dungeon corridor you could twirl around with it. And to further anger your critizism on my trope faible, in a game where barbarians would play an important rule, aka be egligable for PC class there might not be any other polearm available, or only savage versions of glaives or tetsubos or such.</p><p>And tbh I am perfectly fine with ruling that sometimes a dungeon corridor might be to narrow to use long weapons, so the (wo)man upfront could perfectly use his spear but not twirl it in this case, same with a halberd, Also the one in second position could use a reach weapon but also only to thrust.</p><p></p><p>I sometimes want tropes and sometimes not so much, but I hate ridiculous things like a gnome or Halfling wielding a weapon not intended for their body size. It breaks my make believe and I do not enjoy it.</p><p>And if some wants to play powergaming I am ok with it, and he can come up with whatever build he likes, there will be a suitable monster to counter it. And so I tend to agree with the players upfront, and if there is something missing I either try to build it in, build it in with a twist, or suggest something different.</p><p>More often than not my narrow selection is more than enough for my group, some races or classes I like to see in play are not chosen by them many of them are into playing humans e.g. And I also discuss the predominant playstyle and pillar if there is one. And that might be RP or Powergaming or investigation, but I give recommendations upfront e.g. either minmax a bit or put some points into cha for social skillchecks come often or whatever.</p><p></p><p>I do not care about PAM Sentinel combos, because if someone plays a powerhouse in my games it is because I want to dm a game where power house is a possible character build and plan accordingly (e.g. use more spells or mobs which can compensate a bit for the strength of a certain build)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coroc, post: 7872966, member: 6895991"] I was just referring to the pike, which [USER=6704184]@doctorbadwolf[/USER] considered to be an archetypical barbarian weapon but he cleared that up to be a long spear instead. I house rule spear anyway to be a 1d8 two handed 5ft reach weapon whith which you can apply PM in my games, so, no in a normal dungeon corridor you could twirl around with it. And to further anger your critizism on my trope faible, in a game where barbarians would play an important rule, aka be egligable for PC class there might not be any other polearm available, or only savage versions of glaives or tetsubos or such. And tbh I am perfectly fine with ruling that sometimes a dungeon corridor might be to narrow to use long weapons, so the (wo)man upfront could perfectly use his spear but not twirl it in this case, same with a halberd, Also the one in second position could use a reach weapon but also only to thrust. I sometimes want tropes and sometimes not so much, but I hate ridiculous things like a gnome or Halfling wielding a weapon not intended for their body size. It breaks my make believe and I do not enjoy it. And if some wants to play powergaming I am ok with it, and he can come up with whatever build he likes, there will be a suitable monster to counter it. And so I tend to agree with the players upfront, and if there is something missing I either try to build it in, build it in with a twist, or suggest something different. More often than not my narrow selection is more than enough for my group, some races or classes I like to see in play are not chosen by them many of them are into playing humans e.g. And I also discuss the predominant playstyle and pillar if there is one. And that might be RP or Powergaming or investigation, but I give recommendations upfront e.g. either minmax a bit or put some points into cha for social skillchecks come often or whatever. I do not care about PAM Sentinel combos, because if someone plays a powerhouse in my games it is because I want to dm a game where power house is a possible character build and plan accordingly (e.g. use more spells or mobs which can compensate a bit for the strength of a certain build) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are Barbarian’s “Meh”
Top