Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are DMs the Swing Vote?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6177122" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Okay, you've taken the statement out of its original context (talking about edition warriors, specifically) and now moved the goalposts to include fence-sitters. You end up with a strawman, Danny.</p><p></p><p>Each communication has its intended audience. No communication is good for all audiences simultaneously. The warriors are *NOT COMING TO THIS GATEWAY*. Period. Full stop. There is no chance of getting the hardnoses with those articles. They are in exactly the wrong place (the WotC site), coming from the wrong people (WotC insiders), to be convincing to an edition warrior.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Horsehockey. Does the phrase "energize the base" mean nothing to you? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Keeping your strongest advocates in the zone is terribly important for success. You *also* have to reach out to new people, sure. But that probably calls for different communication, in a different place, and a different style. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe - that's a demographic question, and I don't have data to say. Be that as it may, edition warriors are not fence sitters. They are staunchly on one side of the fence, and put up barbed wire land mines to defend their side.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here's the question, though. Knowing your players - was the problem that the communications were wrong, or that the game just wasn't suited for them? Even with the best communications, would they have ended up liking 4e?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right. So, not reading L&L. My point is made, I think. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, but they are probably about 20x less likely to come to your site to read about your product. Folks who are coming to your site for news - the audience for L&L articles, need nudges to keep them focused. They don't need heavy mind-changing. They don't need outreach. </p><p></p><p>There is a whole separate question as to whether WotC is doing proper outreach (or will do it - I can see an argument that it is still too early for outreach). There's a whole separate question as to whether WotC *can* do proper outreach - is there a budget for the kind of advertising that makes outreach work?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6177122, member: 177"] Okay, you've taken the statement out of its original context (talking about edition warriors, specifically) and now moved the goalposts to include fence-sitters. You end up with a strawman, Danny. Each communication has its intended audience. No communication is good for all audiences simultaneously. The warriors are *NOT COMING TO THIS GATEWAY*. Period. Full stop. There is no chance of getting the hardnoses with those articles. They are in exactly the wrong place (the WotC site), coming from the wrong people (WotC insiders), to be convincing to an edition warrior. Horsehockey. Does the phrase "energize the base" mean nothing to you? :) Keeping your strongest advocates in the zone is terribly important for success. You *also* have to reach out to new people, sure. But that probably calls for different communication, in a different place, and a different style. Maybe - that's a demographic question, and I don't have data to say. Be that as it may, edition warriors are not fence sitters. They are staunchly on one side of the fence, and put up barbed wire land mines to defend their side. Here's the question, though. Knowing your players - was the problem that the communications were wrong, or that the game just wasn't suited for them? Even with the best communications, would they have ended up liking 4e? Right. So, not reading L&L. My point is made, I think. Yes, but they are probably about 20x less likely to come to your site to read about your product. Folks who are coming to your site for news - the audience for L&L articles, need nudges to keep them focused. They don't need heavy mind-changing. They don't need outreach. There is a whole separate question as to whether WotC is doing proper outreach (or will do it - I can see an argument that it is still too early for outreach). There's a whole separate question as to whether WotC *can* do proper outreach - is there a budget for the kind of advertising that makes outreach work? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are DMs the Swing Vote?
Top