Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Plane Sailing" data-source="post: 1463838" data-attributes="member: 114">One of the PC's in a game I play in has an astronomical AC (relatively speaking), and he is very difficult for most monsters to hit... but he doesn't do as much damage when the strike actually lands (and in fact the PC worries that he is not effective, despite being very hard to hit).It just becomes that characters &quot;schtick&quot;.interestingly, comparing him to a CR13 challenge - say an evil Storm Giant, the giants attacks are Greatsword +26/+21/+16 melee (4d6+21/19–20) or an Adult Green dragon that gets +26 to hit with its primary (bite); just on a physical level these have a decent chance of snagging him with one of their primary attacks (let alone spell like or magical attacks!)(n.b. once upon a time I thought that expertise didn't stack with fighting defensively (it was considered a sort of &quot;better version of it&quot;. Has that changed, or was I wrong?Cheers</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Plane Sailing, post: 1463838, member: 114"] One of the PC's in a game I play in has an astronomical AC (relatively speaking), and he is very difficult for most monsters to hit... but he doesn't do as much damage when the strike actually lands (and in fact the PC worries that he is not effective, despite being very hard to hit). It just becomes that characters "schtick". interestingly, comparing him to a CR13 challenge - say an evil Storm Giant, the giants attacks are [I]Greatsword +26/+21/+16 melee (4d6+21/19–20)[/I] or an Adult Green dragon that gets +26 to hit with its primary (bite); just on a physical level these have a decent chance of snagging him with one of their primary attacks (let alone spell like or magical attacks!) (n.b. once upon a time I thought that expertise didn't stack with fighting defensively (it was considered a sort of "better version of it". Has that changed, or was I wrong? Cheers [/QUOTE]

Verification