Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Are gamers really that pathetic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Strangemonkey" data-source="post: 1729737" data-attributes="member: 6533"><p>I'm sorry if I came out as being too hostile there, I was trying very hard to shorten the post.</p><p></p><p>At no point did I think that you thought poorly of Jason for doing his homework.</p><p></p><p>I did think, however, that your response was illustrative of the point that the stereo-type itself is negative and that that includes good things as well as bad.</p><p></p><p>As is the case here, a nerd is a nerd is a nerd, and that is always bad, in the logic of calling someone a nerd, and that effectively means that many good things are bad.</p><p></p><p>Which is why I would argue that although a work like Buffy, which tries to make nerds 'cool,' does a good job by busting apart the stereotype...</p><p></p><p>...a work like Revenge of the Nerds does more by subverting it. Sure, you can argue that the individual nerds are negative stereotypes, but the nerds overall are the heroes of the piece and enjoyed a good deal of pop cultural success.</p><p></p><p>Keep in mind, however, that I think both approaches are necessary. I just become leery when I see the first advocated over the second.</p><p></p><p>The first is certainly the easier and prettier route, I just think that the second does some good on its own and the first without the second just works to reinforce the stereotype because all it does is enable the holders of the stereotype to point to exceptions as exceptions.</p><p></p><p>I'm all for being socially acceptable, I'm not for people being out to point out the socially acceptable nerds without being challenged by those socially acceptable nerds.</p><p></p><p>In the longer post I think I made it clearer that I meant a hypothetical adult attacking Jason, as does happen and happens more frequently with non-adults, for doing his homework and not you.</p><p></p><p>Even, though, I would argue that I can point out better examples than Jason, people who play role-playing games who aren't mean, vindictive, and uninterested in the lives of their fellows. I don't think any of them could not be painted with the broad tar of negative nerdiness simply because by playing the game they are nerds, again in the sad logic of it all, and that makes them already and continually a negative type.</p><p></p><p>Take, for example, the geeks from freaks and geeks, no worse off, in the larger sense, than any of the rest of their fellows, it is high school after all, very much the happy center of the show, and yet... </p><p></p><p>On the other hand, Buffy has had some nice role-playing moments, and PVP recently pointed out that Picard LARPS.</p><p></p><p>All better than Jason.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Strangemonkey, post: 1729737, member: 6533"] I'm sorry if I came out as being too hostile there, I was trying very hard to shorten the post. At no point did I think that you thought poorly of Jason for doing his homework. I did think, however, that your response was illustrative of the point that the stereo-type itself is negative and that that includes good things as well as bad. As is the case here, a nerd is a nerd is a nerd, and that is always bad, in the logic of calling someone a nerd, and that effectively means that many good things are bad. Which is why I would argue that although a work like Buffy, which tries to make nerds 'cool,' does a good job by busting apart the stereotype... ...a work like Revenge of the Nerds does more by subverting it. Sure, you can argue that the individual nerds are negative stereotypes, but the nerds overall are the heroes of the piece and enjoyed a good deal of pop cultural success. Keep in mind, however, that I think both approaches are necessary. I just become leery when I see the first advocated over the second. The first is certainly the easier and prettier route, I just think that the second does some good on its own and the first without the second just works to reinforce the stereotype because all it does is enable the holders of the stereotype to point to exceptions as exceptions. I'm all for being socially acceptable, I'm not for people being out to point out the socially acceptable nerds without being challenged by those socially acceptable nerds. In the longer post I think I made it clearer that I meant a hypothetical adult attacking Jason, as does happen and happens more frequently with non-adults, for doing his homework and not you. Even, though, I would argue that I can point out better examples than Jason, people who play role-playing games who aren't mean, vindictive, and uninterested in the lives of their fellows. I don't think any of them could not be painted with the broad tar of negative nerdiness simply because by playing the game they are nerds, again in the sad logic of it all, and that makes them already and continually a negative type. Take, for example, the geeks from freaks and geeks, no worse off, in the larger sense, than any of the rest of their fellows, it is high school after all, very much the happy center of the show, and yet... On the other hand, Buffy has had some nice role-playing moments, and PVP recently pointed out that Picard LARPS. All better than Jason. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Are gamers really that pathetic?
Top