Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are multiclass spellcasters really a non-viable choice?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 1096790" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>I don't know about what everyone else takes viable to mean but I take it to mean "not completely outclassed in a party of iconic style characters"--meaning single classed and reasonably well constructed but not completely min-maxed. (25 point buy means a high score of 15, 28-32 point buy means a high score of 16 etc.)</p><p></p><p>An alternate meaning of viable would be capable of significant contributions in battles appropriate to the party's level. (A troll vs. 5th level characters, an ogre vs. 3rd level characters, a Half-fiend Barbarian 12 vs. 14th level characters, a Balor vs. 20th level characters, or an Ossyluth vs. 9th level characters for instance). It also strongly implies the ability to fight effectively against creatures somewhat higher than party level and suitable for "big boss" roles. (An Ossyluth against a 7th level party or a 13th level wizard against an 11th level party for instance).</p><p></p><p>As to the rest of the post, it's clear that you dislike the D&D magic system and has been for some time. However, I think that you've allowed that dislike to cloud your judgement. Power increases exponentially for all PCs, not just single-classed spellcasters. 11th level fighter barbarians are easily capable of dealing 90 points of damage/round to AC 20 if tweaked a little. I think they compare almost as favorably to 1st level fighters or barbarians as 11th level wizards compare to 1st level wizards. (The power increase comes from higher strength, more magic items (weapons, armor, etc), more base attack bonus, and more feats, all of which have a cumulative effect). (And as to your suggestion that D&D would be more balanced if the most caster levels a spellcaster could have were 1/2, IMO that's ludicrous. A 5th level spellcaster might as well go home as try to make a meaningful contribution to a fight against most CR 10 monsters. (Except maybe a cleric healing the characters able to make real contributions). Any kind of redistribution of spellcasting power on that magnitude would necessitate re-evalutating every CR 4+ creature in the monster manual (as well as rewriting the sor/wiz, druid, and cleric spell lists (a 5d6 fireball is laughable when the barbarian is dealing 90 hp damage/round and has great cleave)).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 1096790, member: 3146"] I don't know about what everyone else takes viable to mean but I take it to mean "not completely outclassed in a party of iconic style characters"--meaning single classed and reasonably well constructed but not completely min-maxed. (25 point buy means a high score of 15, 28-32 point buy means a high score of 16 etc.) An alternate meaning of viable would be capable of significant contributions in battles appropriate to the party's level. (A troll vs. 5th level characters, an ogre vs. 3rd level characters, a Half-fiend Barbarian 12 vs. 14th level characters, a Balor vs. 20th level characters, or an Ossyluth vs. 9th level characters for instance). It also strongly implies the ability to fight effectively against creatures somewhat higher than party level and suitable for "big boss" roles. (An Ossyluth against a 7th level party or a 13th level wizard against an 11th level party for instance). As to the rest of the post, it's clear that you dislike the D&D magic system and has been for some time. However, I think that you've allowed that dislike to cloud your judgement. Power increases exponentially for all PCs, not just single-classed spellcasters. 11th level fighter barbarians are easily capable of dealing 90 points of damage/round to AC 20 if tweaked a little. I think they compare almost as favorably to 1st level fighters or barbarians as 11th level wizards compare to 1st level wizards. (The power increase comes from higher strength, more magic items (weapons, armor, etc), more base attack bonus, and more feats, all of which have a cumulative effect). (And as to your suggestion that D&D would be more balanced if the most caster levels a spellcaster could have were 1/2, IMO that's ludicrous. A 5th level spellcaster might as well go home as try to make a meaningful contribution to a fight against most CR 10 monsters. (Except maybe a cleric healing the characters able to make real contributions). Any kind of redistribution of spellcasting power on that magnitude would necessitate re-evalutating every CR 4+ creature in the monster manual (as well as rewriting the sor/wiz, druid, and cleric spell lists (a 5d6 fireball is laughable when the barbarian is dealing 90 hp damage/round and has great cleave)). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are multiclass spellcasters really a non-viable choice?
Top