Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DiFier" data-source="post: 1231283" data-attributes="member: 2345">Multiclassed charachters are much more adaptable.  I have a Fighter 1/Wizard 6/ Spell sword 6/Eldritgh Knight 2  that's 15th level and 10th level caster.  Sure standing around behind everyone and fire off spells he would be underpowered but he can wonder out into mele combat and not fear for his life.  when he runs out of spells, which happens a lot less now, he is not totally useless.  would a 15th level fighter be a better fighter? yes! would a 15th level wizard be a better spell caster? definitally! but would either be a better adventurer.  It's hard to say but I think not.  In the same campaign I am also playing the other player's cohort who is a rogue4/wizard5/arcane trickster1 in a stand up mele fight he is kind of sad. but fighting on the side of a castle wall or sneaking into a dungeon he rocks.  In breaking into the magic and mundanely sealed treasure room he is great.  He is also great at escaping from almost any jail.  (actually I have yet to test this but that was the way i designed him) not as powerful as a 10th level wizard or rogue but way more adaptable.  he can run down a wall (spider climb) and attack a rogue hanging from a rope.  or sneak past a wizard.when people complain that ther charachter doesn't get to do enough; My fighter just fights but when were not fighting he just stands there twidling his thumbs he's useless, or my Rogue is worthless untill we have to disable traps or find something, or my wizard just buffs the other players.  Those people should try multiclassing.  It's not for everyone but it isn't a suboptimal choice.</blockquote>

Verification