Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are people still playing Pathfinder 1e?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Shey" data-source="post: 8788087" data-attributes="member: 7026617"><p>If those were single opponents, though, the action economy and number of incoming saves needed matters (and the outgoing can be gamed because relatively few opponents in AoOs in many cases). That doesn't mean you can't have some serious risk (in that battle one of the five characters went down promptly in the first round), but just that even with relatively low chances, one thing with 3 actions and 12-15 actions on the other side is not as one-sided as it may appear. (Though I kind of wonder about 75% chance of critting; that has to mean something on the order of a 6 being a crit, which is pretty rare even for a +3 level opponent (I think it would require an opponent with a +24 attack on the average against my current character; a hill giant, which is a level 7 opponent, has a +19; a stone giant, which is level 8, has a +21 (she's level 3). That suggests to me that if you were running into things where your statement is correct you either had an unusually large party (so the opponent uplevelling was abnormal) or you were against things well beyond the range of normal encounters. The same applies to the saves unless you were having to target the opponent's strongest save.</p><p></p><p>This is not go say that you can't get more crits than you like out of a single major opponent encounter (that hill giant would be critting Jenesa on 11, which is a 50% chance) but just that if your statement is correct there was something wrong with the numbers your GM was using.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But there are a lot of ways to do small ticks on that; things that leave an opponent flatfooted for example. It really is a game about a lot of characters making the target more vulnerable so someone else can start making its life unpleasant. This is limited and uncertain, but again, if it wasn't, what would the monster level system be good for? CR was certainly nearly useless in 3e by the time you got to moderate levels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas Shey, post: 8788087, member: 7026617"] If those were single opponents, though, the action economy and number of incoming saves needed matters (and the outgoing can be gamed because relatively few opponents in AoOs in many cases). That doesn't mean you can't have some serious risk (in that battle one of the five characters went down promptly in the first round), but just that even with relatively low chances, one thing with 3 actions and 12-15 actions on the other side is not as one-sided as it may appear. (Though I kind of wonder about 75% chance of critting; that has to mean something on the order of a 6 being a crit, which is pretty rare even for a +3 level opponent (I think it would require an opponent with a +24 attack on the average against my current character; a hill giant, which is a level 7 opponent, has a +19; a stone giant, which is level 8, has a +21 (she's level 3). That suggests to me that if you were running into things where your statement is correct you either had an unusually large party (so the opponent uplevelling was abnormal) or you were against things well beyond the range of normal encounters. The same applies to the saves unless you were having to target the opponent's strongest save. This is not go say that you can't get more crits than you like out of a single major opponent encounter (that hill giant would be critting Jenesa on 11, which is a 50% chance) but just that if your statement is correct there was something wrong with the numbers your GM was using. But there are a lot of ways to do small ticks on that; things that leave an opponent flatfooted for example. It really is a game about a lot of characters making the target more vulnerable so someone else can start making its life unpleasant. This is limited and uncertain, but again, if it wasn't, what would the monster level system be good for? CR was certainly nearly useless in 3e by the time you got to moderate levels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are people still playing Pathfinder 1e?
Top