Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="haakon1" data-source="post: 9650815" data-attributes="member: 25619">Agree with all that on why we prefer 3.5e (Core Rules, no splat books and only a few rules approved one-by-one from books beyond the PHB, DMG, MM’s, Living Greyhawk Gazetteer, and Legends &amp; Lore) as well.That’s a big one my group agrees on, for AD&amp;D/3x over PF1 and later D&amp;D.I’m a huge Greyhawk fan, but I appreciate Golarion as a setting.&nbsp; I haven’t used it per se. &lt;&lt;We like prestige classes and use them as they were intended (our campaign has a select handful that are flavored for the campaign and have certain RP requirements to acquire). &gt;&gt;We have very little use of Prestige classes.&lt;&lt;Basically 3e is quite rooted in AD&amp;D, 3.5 was a very small step away from that, Pathfinder was a much bigger step.&gt;&gt;I often think 3.5e was the final edition of AD&amp;D. Same.Yup.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="haakon1, post: 9650815, member: 25619"] Agree with all that on why we prefer 3.5e (Core Rules, no splat books and only a few rules approved one-by-one from books beyond the PHB, DMG, MM’s, Living Greyhawk Gazetteer, and Legends & Lore) as well. That’s a big one my group agrees on, for AD&D/3x over PF1 and later D&D. I’m a huge Greyhawk fan, but I appreciate Golarion as a setting. I haven’t used it per se. [SIZE=13px] <<We like prestige classes and use them as they were intended (our campaign has a select handful that are flavored for the campaign and have certain RP requirements to acquire). >> We have very little use of Prestige classes. <<Basically 3e is quite rooted in AD&D, 3.5 was a very small step away from that, Pathfinder was a much bigger step.>> I often think 3.5e was the final edition of AD&D. [/SIZE] Same. Yup. [/QUOTE]

Verification