Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Drudenfusz" data-source="post: 6727798" data-attributes="member: 73113"><p>I have to say, I have no issue with metagaming. Iactually think it usually makes the game better, so I prefer to have all rolls in the open. A players who rolls bad, can then play out then the character is probably not focused enough on the task at hand or otherwise distracted or lacks concentartion. Seeing the dice is also great for suspense, just like in a good Movie where the audience might know more than the characters involved, and I trust my players that they use that knowledge to enrich the game, and they usually do, since this cooperative gaming with each other based on that transparancy grows out of that mutual trust. While I think hiding results and such things only creates the idea of the players playing against the GM and thus their metagaming automatically is pushed more in the direction on how they can overcome the GM, instead of how to tell an interesting story with what the dice provide.</p></blockquote><p></p>