Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are PrC's too powerful?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 859970" data-attributes="member: 8158"><p>Good points all, Technik. Would've said it myself had I gotten here earlier...snipped the part about the oozemaster though <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>While a lot of people were complaining that the Ranger was broken and didn't fit their personal concept of what a ranger should be (rushing off to cobble together a million different variants) it seemed to occur to only a handful of people to use PrC's to flesh out any particular specialized role. Masters of the Wild did a nice job of this for the most part. You want a tracker that's an implacable manhunter? Bloodhound. Yearn for an archer that's can thread a needle at 100 paces? Deepwood Sniper. Think it'd be cool to play an expert monster killer? Foe Hunter. How about a Tarzan or Beastmaster-type? King of the Jungle and Beast Lord (respectively). OK, the Tempest is a gimp, but other than MotW did a great job for the ranger.</p><p></p><p>Now, wizard-oriented PrC's put off a lot of people, because often it seems that the class simply enhances the power of the wizard without costing him anything, It's a complaint that goes all the way back to the loremaster in the DMG. And it's usually accurate. But it might to help to stop and notice that, unlike most other classes, the wizard doesn't have anything to trade off. He can't settle for a lower hit die, a lower BAB, fewer skill points, or worse saving throws. He's already sucking it up in all of those areas. If he opts to simply "miss out" on abilities that he'd gain by staying in the core class, it's quite a shaft because all he gets is spellcasting and a free feat every 5 levels. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I'm inclined to say that the problem isn't the PrC's, but rather that wizzies (and sors) are light on class features. Note that clerics CAN trade off in most of the aforementioned areas, so as a result they get spiffier PrC's that fewer people complain about....and by taking the Magic domain, they can even co-opt a large portion of the wizard's role. Ever seen the look on a wizard's face when the priest of Boccob wins the roll off for a wand of fireballs? Priceless. In short, DM's please support your local wizard: be magnanimous with their PrC's. It's their great equalizer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felon, post: 859970, member: 8158"] Good points all, Technik. Would've said it myself had I gotten here earlier...snipped the part about the oozemaster though :) While a lot of people were complaining that the Ranger was broken and didn't fit their personal concept of what a ranger should be (rushing off to cobble together a million different variants) it seemed to occur to only a handful of people to use PrC's to flesh out any particular specialized role. Masters of the Wild did a nice job of this for the most part. You want a tracker that's an implacable manhunter? Bloodhound. Yearn for an archer that's can thread a needle at 100 paces? Deepwood Sniper. Think it'd be cool to play an expert monster killer? Foe Hunter. How about a Tarzan or Beastmaster-type? King of the Jungle and Beast Lord (respectively). OK, the Tempest is a gimp, but other than MotW did a great job for the ranger. Now, wizard-oriented PrC's put off a lot of people, because often it seems that the class simply enhances the power of the wizard without costing him anything, It's a complaint that goes all the way back to the loremaster in the DMG. And it's usually accurate. But it might to help to stop and notice that, unlike most other classes, the wizard doesn't have anything to trade off. He can't settle for a lower hit die, a lower BAB, fewer skill points, or worse saving throws. He's already sucking it up in all of those areas. If he opts to simply "miss out" on abilities that he'd gain by staying in the core class, it's quite a shaft because all he gets is spellcasting and a free feat every 5 levels. Personally, I'm inclined to say that the problem isn't the PrC's, but rather that wizzies (and sors) are light on class features. Note that clerics CAN trade off in most of the aforementioned areas, so as a result they get spiffier PrC's that fewer people complain about....and by taking the Magic domain, they can even co-opt a large portion of the wizard's role. Ever seen the look on a wizard's face when the priest of Boccob wins the roll off for a wand of fireballs? Priceless. In short, DM's please support your local wizard: be magnanimous with their PrC's. It's their great equalizer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are PrC's too powerful?
Top