Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are Rakes Secondary, Primary, or Both?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="frankthedm" data-source="post: 3009632" data-attributes="member: 1164"><p>The jury has been assembled. Based on thier write ups, I believe that Rakes </p><p></p><p><em>Get Primary “to hit”, </em></p><p><em>Do not count for weapon focus claw, </em></p><p><em>Do count as claws for improved natural attack since that feat does assume the creature’s natural weapons are larger than the norm </em></p><p><em>Only have ½ STR bonus to damage.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Supporters of this…</strong></p><p></p><p>Behir rakes have the primary ‘to hit’ of its bite attack and only get ½ str. The rake damage die is also smaller than usual but they do get 6 of them....</p><p></p><p>Dire lions operate like two primary claws not getting weapon focus and only geting ½ STR bonus.</p><p></p><p>Hieracosphinxes’ Rakes have the primary ‘to hit’ of its bite attack and deals damage like it’s secondary claw attacks</p><p></p><p>Lammaus’ rakes are like two primary claw attacks that only get ½ str.</p><p></p><p>Leopards’ Rakes have the primary ‘to hit’ of its bite attack and deals damage like it’s secondary claw attacks</p><p></p><p>Lions’ rakes are like two primary claw attacks that only get ½ str.</p><p></p><p>Tigers’ rakes are like two primary claw attacks that only get ½ str. They do get the benefit of improved natural attack claw on these rakes.</p><p></p><p><strong>Anomalies to this…</strong></p><p></p><p>Dire tiger’s rake operates like 2 “non-primary back claws” getting weapon focus and ½ str bonus. I also think the 2d4 claw damage is a typo since there is no way to get “2d4” with an improved natural attack. 1d6 goes to 1d8, 1d8 goes to 2d6. Either that or they gave the dire tiger a tiny upgrade from the tiger’s improved natural attack that was already a 1d8. </p><p></p><p>Leonal’s Rakes are two primary claw attacks.</p><p></p><p>Skums’ rakes are like two secondary claw attacks that only get ½ str. They get these as normal attacks while in the water, not part of the Bite, improved grab then Rake combo..</p><p></p><p>Tayellas’ rakes have the “to hit” of a secondary natural weapon and does not get the benefits of the weapon focus / epic weapon focus feats it has. The claws it usually uses have damage dice of 2d6 +11, the claws it walks on and only use to rake have damage dice of 4d6+5 [The stat block shows the damage bonus as +15 though the rake entry says +5].</p><p></p><p></p><p>Just noticed this in the SRD, Is this why so many critters with <em>rake</em> and <em>pounce</em> specify the critter rakes on a <em>pounce</em>...</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Lime">Rake</span></p><p><span style="color: Lime">A creature with this special attack gains extra natural attacks when it grapples its foe. Normally, a monster can attack with only one of its natural weapons while grappling, but a monster with the rake ability usually gains two additional claw attacks that it can use only against a grappled foe. Rake attacks are not subject to the usual -4 penalty for attacking with a natural weapon in a grapple. </span></p><p><span style="color: Lime"></span></p><p><span style="color: Lime"><span style="font-size: 12px">A monster with the rake ability must begin its turn grappling to use its rake—it can’t begin a grapple and rake in the same turn. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="frankthedm, post: 3009632, member: 1164"] The jury has been assembled. Based on thier write ups, I believe that Rakes [I]Get Primary “to hit”, Do not count for weapon focus claw, Do count as claws for improved natural attack since that feat does assume the creature’s natural weapons are larger than the norm Only have ½ STR bonus to damage.[/I] [B]Supporters of this…[/B] Behir rakes have the primary ‘to hit’ of its bite attack and only get ½ str. The rake damage die is also smaller than usual but they do get 6 of them.... Dire lions operate like two primary claws not getting weapon focus and only geting ½ STR bonus. Hieracosphinxes’ Rakes have the primary ‘to hit’ of its bite attack and deals damage like it’s secondary claw attacks Lammaus’ rakes are like two primary claw attacks that only get ½ str. Leopards’ Rakes have the primary ‘to hit’ of its bite attack and deals damage like it’s secondary claw attacks Lions’ rakes are like two primary claw attacks that only get ½ str. Tigers’ rakes are like two primary claw attacks that only get ½ str. They do get the benefit of improved natural attack claw on these rakes. [B]Anomalies to this…[/B] Dire tiger’s rake operates like 2 “non-primary back claws” getting weapon focus and ½ str bonus. I also think the 2d4 claw damage is a typo since there is no way to get “2d4” with an improved natural attack. 1d6 goes to 1d8, 1d8 goes to 2d6. Either that or they gave the dire tiger a tiny upgrade from the tiger’s improved natural attack that was already a 1d8. Leonal’s Rakes are two primary claw attacks. Skums’ rakes are like two secondary claw attacks that only get ½ str. They get these as normal attacks while in the water, not part of the Bite, improved grab then Rake combo.. Tayellas’ rakes have the “to hit” of a secondary natural weapon and does not get the benefits of the weapon focus / epic weapon focus feats it has. The claws it usually uses have damage dice of 2d6 +11, the claws it walks on and only use to rake have damage dice of 4d6+5 [The stat block shows the damage bonus as +15 though the rake entry says +5]. Just noticed this in the SRD, Is this why so many critters with [I]rake[/I] and [I]pounce[/I] specify the critter rakes on a [I]pounce[/I]... [COLOR=Lime]Rake A creature with this special attack gains extra natural attacks when it grapples its foe. Normally, a monster can attack with only one of its natural weapons while grappling, but a monster with the rake ability usually gains two additional claw attacks that it can use only against a grappled foe. Rake attacks are not subject to the usual -4 penalty for attacking with a natural weapon in a grapple. [SIZE=3]A monster with the rake ability must begin its turn grappling to use its rake—it can’t begin a grapple and rake in the same turn. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are Rakes Secondary, Primary, or Both?
Top