Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3406944" data-attributes="member: 35788">Personally, I am of the complete opposite opinion.&nbsp; Of course, I also have a very serious &quot;buyer beware&quot; mentality.&nbsp; I love the fact that WotC keeps putting out new classes ... and to be honet I was upset that Dragon Magic only had one - and I think Comple Mage had none, right?&nbsp; Anyway, I love to see new classes, so long as they don't significantly advance &quot;powercreep.&quot; {However you define that term is fine with me}I love all the new classes because it adds variety.&nbsp; If I want to play a spellcaster who is themed around being sneaky I can do it without multiclassing and making myself &quot;weak.&quot;&nbsp; I can be a beguiler.&nbsp; If I want to play a gish {In the general non-specific sense of the term} I can do so without multiclassing into a wizard/fighter and making myself weak.&nbsp; I like options.In the same light, I am also a fervent believer that DMs need to make sure that they think when they DM.&nbsp; For example, I don't like Bo9S, any of the &quot;Races of ...&quot; books, or setting specific texts.&nbsp; So, I limit the choices of things to what I like.&nbsp; That is required!So ... what I am saying is that I totally respect DMs who limit their book selection.&nbsp; But I also love all the new choices!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 3406944, member: 35788"] Personally, I am of the complete opposite opinion. Of course, I also have a very serious "buyer beware" mentality. I love the fact that WotC keeps putting out new classes ... and to be honet I was upset that Dragon Magic only had one - and I think Comple Mage had none, right? Anyway, I love to see new classes, so long as they don't significantly advance "powercreep." {However you define that term is fine with me} I love all the new classes because it adds variety. If I want to play a spellcaster who is themed around being sneaky I can do it without multiclassing and making myself "weak." I can be a beguiler. If I want to play a gish {In the general non-specific sense of the term} I can do so without multiclassing into a wizard/fighter and making myself weak. I like options. In the same light, I am also a fervent believer that DMs need to make sure that they think when they DM. For example, I don't like Bo9S, any of the "Races of ..." books, or setting specific texts. So, I limit the choices of things to what I like. That is required! So ... what I am saying is that I totally respect DMs who limit their book selection. But I also love all the new choices! [/QUOTE]

Verification