Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="comrade raoul" data-source="post: 1517243" data-attributes="member: 554">To some extent I certainly agree with you -- to the point that I want to use this opportunity to <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=86907" target="_blank">pimp</a> my "warrior" core class -- an <a href="http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/04/bagley/warrior.htm" target="_blank">overhauled, modular fighter that incorporates the light/heavy distinction from the AU unfettered and warmain classes and uses a wide array of abilities to effectively model numerous archetypical combat specialists</a>!But otherwise, though, this problem doesn't have to be an issue with the fighter class -- if you had a lot of really good high-level combat feats with lots of prerequisites, in practice you'd need to be a fighter to access any substantial number of them, which would in turn make the fighter more powerful compared to other classes (and you wouldn't have to change the fighter's class progression at all).</blockquote>