Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ph0rk" data-source="post: 1517273" data-attributes="member: 16266">I understand your idea; but why bother making a few high-level fighter only feats; why not add special abilities to the fighter (like rogues get from level 10 on).  Fighters seem neat from 1-12, but from 13-20; why on earth aren't you taking barbarian, paladin, or ranger levels?  The 4 feats the fighter gains in these levels just don't compete - power wise - to the abilities the other 4 warrior classes get in their first 8; much less the abilities any of the other core classes get from 13-20. I'd list examples; but I can hardly even imagine anyone disputing this.I don't want to make this a fighter-whine thread, and I think any deficiency in feats in the PHB re fighters is more a problem with the fighter class than the feat lists.  All the other classes are fine.  (And fighters are probably okay at least up to level 10)Ultimately I guess I'd like to see everything (spellcasting too) in feat-form, but that would take a total overhaul rather than adding more feats to the core rules.</blockquote>