Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Emirikol" data-source="post: 3551857" data-attributes="member: 10638">The reason I purchase preprinted campaigns is so I don't have to the work.&nbsp; They need to be vibrant and continuing with new stuff..not rehashes of the old stuff but because of a campaign change.A rather bizarre but intriguing situation would be if they produced a &quot;dead campaign&quot; and a vibrant (version B) campaign.&nbsp; Alternate worlds if you will.&nbsp; Then DM's who have spent the last 37 years playing in a world they've made their own, won't feel like a company is shoving changes down their throats (like removing assassins and monks..for instance........&nbsp; ......&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; .......&nbsp;&nbsp; ......)It's been clear from the start that nobody (not even Erik Mona) have had the heart to do massive changes to greyhawk..we're stuck defining meaningless dead-ends of the campaign...well, they've been mostly defined.&nbsp; No wonder GH can't get support anymore.On the otherhand, FR was able to &quot;kill off a god&quot; that mattered and made some serious changes to the campaign over the years.Although, the canon issue was cool when it first started, because we never had a comprehensive product, it's now become a burden too.&nbsp; We've got to quote it like some kind of bible..the canon documents were produced so we could use them..to breathe life..to record changes..to make changes.What's this new product coming up?&nbsp; jh</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Emirikol, post: 3551857, member: 10638"] The reason I purchase preprinted campaigns is so I don't have to the work. They need to be vibrant and continuing with new stuff..not rehashes of the old stuff but because of a campaign change. A rather bizarre but intriguing situation would be if they produced a "dead campaign" and a vibrant (version B) campaign. Alternate worlds if you will. Then DM's who have spent the last 37 years playing in a world they've made their own, won't feel like a company is shoving changes down their throats (like removing assassins and monks..for instance........ ...... ....... ......) It's been clear from the start that nobody (not even Erik Mona) have had the heart to do massive changes to greyhawk..we're stuck defining meaningless dead-ends of the campaign...well, they've been mostly defined. No wonder GH can't get support anymore. On the otherhand, FR was able to "kill off a god" that mattered and made some serious changes to the campaign over the years. Although, the canon issue was cool when it first started, because we never had a comprehensive product, it's now become a burden too. We've got to quote it like some kind of bible..the canon documents were produced so we could use them..to breathe life..to record changes..to make changes. What's this new product coming up? jh [/QUOTE]

Verification