Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are there any plans for a Pathfinder "basic"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 5334602" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>I would be inclined to get rid of virtually all the Greater feats, leaving most trees about two feats deep, plus all the Extra feats. It's also tempting to ditch Athletic, Persuaive, etc. since they take up so much space, and are less often used; sample PCs and monsters can instead simply take the much more easily remembered Skill Focus feat when appropriate. I'd also probably trim some of the more esoteric feats like Step Up and Channel Smite. Quicken Spell is obviously gone, assuming a level 6 cap. The feat list doesn't have to be tiny, in any case, just removed of confusing and extraneous information. I might take off Arcane Armor Proficiency and not include any references to multiclassing in the basic set; too bad for bards in medium armor, I suppose.</p><p></p><p>I might consider removing Combat Expertise and all its constituent parts, if I also remove the Monk. If I remove the Monk, I keep Improved Unarmed Strike and Deflect Arrows but remove the rest of the unarmed feats.</p><p></p><p>The spell lists would require more judicious pruning. </p><p></p><p>Races:</p><p>Human</p><p>Dwarf</p><p>Elf</p><p>Halfling (LOTR appeal, you know)</p><p></p><p>Classes:</p><p>Fighter</p><p>Cleric (limited to only some of the domains, and removing any explicit references to specific deities; you pick two domains, basically)</p><p>Rogue</p><p>Wizard (Universalist, with maybe Illusionists and Necromaners as well)</p><p>Sorcerer (Arcane, plus Fey, Infernal only, I think)</p><p></p><p>I'd also be tempted to include the Cavalier and the Witch, actually. Neither requires a lot of supporting rules, and both are pretty classic archetypes.</p><p></p><p>Not to include</p><p>Paladin: Overlaps with fighter and cleric, smite is medium complicated, most of the high-payoff abilities are higher level, not having to mess with divine bond</p><p>Barbarian: It's not awesome, but you could play a Fighter as though he were a barbarian, also rage is medium complicated</p><p>Ranger: Complicated.</p><p>Bard: Bard music is interesting, but not ideal for new players. </p><p>Oracle: Most of the oracle curses involve special conditions and qualities, eg. darkvision, blindsense, etc.</p><p>Alchemist: Um, yeah. "Hi, I'm a caster with 'chemical rage' who makes you learn splash weapon rules."</p><p>Monk: Less vital archetype, fairly challenging, leans on many feats you might not want to emphasize.</p><p>Druid: Animal companions are medium complicated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 5334602, member: 15538"] I would be inclined to get rid of virtually all the Greater feats, leaving most trees about two feats deep, plus all the Extra feats. It's also tempting to ditch Athletic, Persuaive, etc. since they take up so much space, and are less often used; sample PCs and monsters can instead simply take the much more easily remembered Skill Focus feat when appropriate. I'd also probably trim some of the more esoteric feats like Step Up and Channel Smite. Quicken Spell is obviously gone, assuming a level 6 cap. The feat list doesn't have to be tiny, in any case, just removed of confusing and extraneous information. I might take off Arcane Armor Proficiency and not include any references to multiclassing in the basic set; too bad for bards in medium armor, I suppose. I might consider removing Combat Expertise and all its constituent parts, if I also remove the Monk. If I remove the Monk, I keep Improved Unarmed Strike and Deflect Arrows but remove the rest of the unarmed feats. The spell lists would require more judicious pruning. Races: Human Dwarf Elf Halfling (LOTR appeal, you know) Classes: Fighter Cleric (limited to only some of the domains, and removing any explicit references to specific deities; you pick two domains, basically) Rogue Wizard (Universalist, with maybe Illusionists and Necromaners as well) Sorcerer (Arcane, plus Fey, Infernal only, I think) I'd also be tempted to include the Cavalier and the Witch, actually. Neither requires a lot of supporting rules, and both are pretty classic archetypes. Not to include Paladin: Overlaps with fighter and cleric, smite is medium complicated, most of the high-payoff abilities are higher level, not having to mess with divine bond Barbarian: It's not awesome, but you could play a Fighter as though he were a barbarian, also rage is medium complicated Ranger: Complicated. Bard: Bard music is interesting, but not ideal for new players. Oracle: Most of the oracle curses involve special conditions and qualities, eg. darkvision, blindsense, etc. Alchemist: Um, yeah. "Hi, I'm a caster with 'chemical rage' who makes you learn splash weapon rules." Monk: Less vital archetype, fairly challenging, leans on many feats you might not want to emphasize. Druid: Animal companions are medium complicated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are there any plans for a Pathfinder "basic"?
Top