Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="graydoom" data-source="post: 28547" data-attributes="member: 164">Re: agreedPersonally, I agree on this. I think that stunning attack works fine as it is. But if someone else doesn't, I'll still do my best to help them fix the problem they see in a (semi-)balanced manner. And that was my best suggestion for fixing the problem he saw (stunning attack working vs large+ creatures) with a balanced solution (bonuses to saves) instead of a solution that totally nerfs stunning attack (like total immunity for large+ creatures).[thought process explanation mode]Even if I disagree with the basic assumptions (namely, that stunning attack shouldn't work vs large creatures), I still try to do my best to help out. I'll argue strenuously that stunning attack is perfectly fine as it is, but if someone says &quot;Sigh, I just think it shouldn't be as good vs large+ creatures, and don't really want to debate that point&quot; I will say &quot;Sigh, I don't agree with you on that, but here's a way to give you that effect without too much harm done.&quot; That's one of the big considerations I make when posting... sometimes, people will ask you to accept some basic assumptions that you may disagree with, and the best thing to do is just accept them and help the person the best you can. Argument on the basic assumptions past a certain point just bogs down the discussion.[/thought process explanation mode]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="graydoom, post: 28547, member: 164"] [b]Re: agreed[/b] Personally, I agree on this. I think that stunning attack works fine as it is. But if someone else doesn't, I'll still do my best to help them fix the problem they see in a (semi-)balanced manner. And that was my best suggestion for fixing the problem he saw (stunning attack working vs large+ creatures) with a balanced solution (bonuses to saves) instead of a solution that totally nerfs stunning attack (like total immunity for large+ creatures). [thought process explanation mode] Even if I disagree with the basic assumptions (namely, that stunning attack shouldn't work vs large creatures), I still try to do my best to help out. I'll argue strenuously that stunning attack is perfectly fine as it is, but if someone says "Sigh, I just think it shouldn't be as good vs large+ creatures, and don't really want to debate that point" I will say "Sigh, I don't agree with you on that, but here's a way to give you that effect without too much harm done." That's one of the big considerations I make when posting... sometimes, people will ask you to accept some basic assumptions that you may disagree with, and the best thing to do is just accept them and help the person the best you can. Argument on the basic assumptions past a certain point just bogs down the discussion. [/thought process explanation mode] [/QUOTE]

Verification